Skip to main content
. 2022 May 2;17(5):e0267865. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267865

Table 1. Counselors’ characteristics pre- (T0) and post (T1) NIPT implementation and participation in the blended learning program.

Characteristics T0 T1 Dutch counselor population
N = 1,635 N = 913 N = 2,8135
Age mean (SD) in years 37.0 (10.9) 38.0 (11.1) -
Experience (in years), n (%)
≤5 years 395 (24.2) 268 (29.4) -
6–10 years 487(29.8) 406 (44.5)
≥11 years 753 (46.0) 239 (26.1)
Profession1, n (%)
Midwife primary care 1,358 (83.1) 727 (79.6) 2,125 (79.1)
Midwife secondary care 110 (6.7) 41 (4.5) 79 (3.0)
Gynecologist 91 (5.6) 41 (4.5) 40 (1.5)
Sonographer2 244 (14.9) 52 (5.7) 441 (16.4)
Other3 80 (4.9) 47 (5.1)
Regional Prenatal Screening Center4, n (%)
Region 1 323 (19.7) 216 (23.7)
Region 2 255 (15.6) 138 (15.1)
Region 3 190 (11.6) 78 (8.5)
Region 4 147 (9.0) 80 (8.8)
Region 5 302 (18.5) 185 (20.3)
Region 6 234 (14.3) 156 (17.1)
Region 7 207 (12.7) 87 (9.5)
Attitude toward NIPT, n (%)
Positive 1,228 (74.7) 724 (85.6)
Negative 117 (7.1) 35 (4.1)
Neutral 299 (18.2) 87 (10.3)
Participation in blended learning activities
E-learning completed, n (%)
Yes Not 909 (99.6)
No applicable 4 (0.4)
Attended face-to-face seminar, n (%)
Yes Not 910 (99.7) -
No applicable 3 (0.3)

Valid percentages are shown

1 Participants might have had more than one profession and answered accordingly; therefore, numbers add up to more than N = 1,635/N = 913

2 Most sonographers were also midwives

3 Gynecologist in residence, nurse, reproductive physician

4 Data of the two Regional Prenatal Screening Centers in Amsterdam are merged

5 Annual Report of all national Regional Prenatal Screening Centers 2018.