Table 1.
Study 1: Faces occluded by face masks | ||||
Stimulus type | Judgment | Masking | ICC (2, 70) | ICC 95% CI |
CG | Dominance | Masked | .97 *** | [.930, .997] |
Unmasked | .99 *** | [.963, .998] | ||
Trustw. | Masked | .96 *** | [.888, .995] | |
Unmasked | .98 *** | [.959, .998] | ||
Real-life | Dominance | Masked | .98 *** | [.941, .997] |
Unmasked | .98 *** | [.938, .997] | ||
Trustw. | Masked | .91 *** | [.787, .990] | |
Unmasked | .91 *** | [.771, .989] | ||
Study 2: Faces occluded by square image | ||||
Stimulus type | Judgment | Face dimension | ICC (2, 70) | ICC 95% CI |
Real-life | Dominance | Dominance | .98 *** | [.941, .999] |
Trustw. | .98 *** | [.932, .999] | ||
Trustw. | Dominance | .91 *** | [.679, .999] | |
Trustw. | .94 *** | [.790, .999] |
*** p < .001
ICC intraclass correlation coefficient, CI confidence interval, CG computer-generated