Table 2.

Study 1a: Effect sizes of the difference between the ratings of the high and low poles of a face dimension for each condition

			Face dimension pole
Face dimension	Judgment	Masking	High M (SD)	Low M (SD)	High vs. Low	Cohen’s d [95% CI]
Dominance	Dominance	Masked	6.24 (1.48)	4.37 (1.49)	p < .001	0.96 [0.76, 1.17]
		Unmasked	6.40 (1.42)	4.21 (1.58)	p < .001	1.01 [0.81, 1.21]
	Trustw.	Masked	4.36 (1.40)	5.12 (1.50)	p < .001	-0.30 [-0.47, -0.13]
		Unmasked	4.63 (1.57)	5.78 (1.53)	p < .001	-0.36 [-0.53, -0.19]
Trustw.	Dominance	Masked	4.90 (1.22)	5.21 (1.52)	p = .018	-0.30 [-0.47, -0.13]
		Unmasked	4.53 (1.47)	5.89 (1.55)	p < .001	-0.70 [-0.89, -0.52]
	Trustw	Masked	5.49 (1.42)	4.19 (1.38)	p < .001	0.73 [0.55, 0.92]
		Unmasked	6.42 (1.44)	4.10 (1.44)	p < .001	1.08 [0.88, 1.30]

n = 280 for all cell means; positive (negative) Cohen’s d values indicate higher mean rating for the high (low) pole of face dimension. A Benjamini-Hochberg correction was applied to all p-values in this analysis