Table 3.

Study 1b: Effect sizes of the difference between the ratings of the high and low poles of a face dimension for each condition

			Face dimension pole
Face dimension	Judgment	Masking	High M (SD)	Low M (SD)	High vs. Low	Cohen’s d [95% CI]
Dominance	Dominance	Masked	6.18 (1.56)	4.08 (1.49)	p < .001	1.13 [0.83, 1.44]
		Unmasked	6.19 (1.66)	4.06 (1.66)	p < .001	1.12 [0.82, 1.43]
	Trustw.	Masked	4.38 (1.46)	5.44 (1.47)	p < .001	-0.71 [-0.98, -0.45]
		Unmasked	4.29 (1.71)	5.03 (1.73)	p = .003	-0.38 [-0.63, -0.14]
Trustw.	Dominance	Masked	4.50 (1.38)	5.34 (1.49)	p < .001	-0.65 [-0.91, -0.39]
		Unmasked	4.51 (1.51)	5.66 (1.69)	p < .001	-0.73 [-1, -0.47]
	Trustw.	Masked	5.36 (1.51)	5.24 (1.62)	p = .611	0.08 [-0.15, 0.32]
		Unmasked	5.3 (1.54)	4.24 (1.55)	p < .001	0.69 [0.43, 0.96]

n = 140 for all cell means; positive (negative) Cohen’s d values indicate higher mean rating for the high (low) pole of face dimension. A Benjamini-Hochberg correction was applied to all p-values in this analysis