Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 11;9(9):4735–4743. doi: 10.1039/c8ra09899a

Comparison of electrosorption capacity for various biomass-based CDI electrodes and treatment/materials for electrode fabrication.

Biomass Activation/treatment Binder/additives Current collector Applied voltage (V) Electrosorption capacity (mg g−1)
Citrus peel37 ZnCl2 PTFE Titanium mesh 1.5 10.79, 16.2a
KOH PTFE Titanium mesh 1.5 8.58
H3PO4 PTFE Titanium mesh 1.5 5.22
PTFE Titanium mesh 1.5 8.44
Bacterial-cellulose38 NH3 1.2 17.29
Bacterial-cellulose39 H3PO4 1.2 16.20
Bacterial-cellulose40 1.2 12.81
Palm shell41 ZnCl2, CO2 PVdf, DMAc 1.2 3.3
Wheat straw42 KOH, SiO2 sol PTFE Graphite sheet N/A 2.67
Silk cocoon43 Acetylene black, PVA Graphite substrate 1.2 12.02
CO2 Acetylene black, PVA Graphite substrate 1.2 16.56
L. leucocephala wood24 KOH, CO2 PVDF 1.0 2.1
Coconut shell44 KOH, CO2 PVDF 1.0 20.91
Woody biomass45 KOH Nafion Carbon cloth N/A 5.39
Basswood46 CO2 1.2 5.7
Mangrove root (this work) 1.5 9.6
a

Electrode only used as anode in CDI system.