Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 25;2022:4721904. doi: 10.1155/2022/4721904

Table 3.

Time trend of complication rates in different steps of phacoemulsification performed by residents.

Jul 2005–Sep 2007 Oct 2007–Dec 2009 Jan 2010–Mar 2012 Apr 2012–Jun 2014 Jul 2014–Sep 2016 Oct 2016–Dec 2018 Jan 2019–Mar 2021 p value
Events/cases 63/226 42/201 28/193 28/237 16/182 17/178 14/192
Rate in step A (events/cases) 0.4% 0.5% 0% 0% 0.5% 0% 0% 0.6761
(1/226) (1/201) (0/193) (0/237) (1/182) (0/178) (0/192)
Rate in step B (events/cases) 10.2% 9.5% 6.2% 6.8% 2.8% 2.2% 2.6% 0.0007
(23/226) (19/200) (12/193) (16/237) (5/181) (4/178) (5/192)
Rate in step C (events/cases) 13.3% (27/203) 9.6% (17/177) 7.9% (13/165) 5.6% (11/198) 5.6% (9/162) 6.0% (10/168) 3.8% (7/184) 0.0085
Rate in step D (events/cases) 5.3% (10/187) 3.2% (5/156) 1.5% (2/135) 0.7% (1/143) 0.8% (1/124) 2.2% (3/138) 0.6% (1/163) 0.027
Rate in step E (events/cases) 1.1% (2/186) 0% 0.8% 0% 0% 0% 0.6% 0.4103
(0/153) (1/133) (0/142) (0/122) (0/134) (1/161)

A: wound incision; B: anterior capsulorhexis; C: hydrodissection, hydrodelineation, and emulsification of nucleus; D: irrigation and aspiration of cortex; and E: IOL insertion. p value by Chi-squared test.