Table 4.
1Direct effect | 2Total indirect effect | 3Total effect | 4Percentage of mediation | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β (95% CI) | P value | β (95% CI) | P value | β (95% CI) | P value | ||
Mother’s education | 0.017 (−0.003, 0.035) | 0.06 | 0.004 (−0.001, 0.01) | 0.10 | 0.021 (0.004, 0.036) | 0.038 | 19.04% |
Values are regression β coefficients (95% CIs) derived from path analysis. Mediation analyses were tested by using bootstrapping methods with bias-corrected confidence estimates
SES socioeconomic status, TL telomere length, PSS Perceived Stress Score
1Derivation of direct effects. In the path model, the effect size (coefficient) of a direct path is the regression coefficient between two variables
2Derivation of indirect effects. In the path model, the effect size (coefficient) of an indirect path is evaluated by calculating the product of the coefficients along that path
3Derivation of total effects. Direct and indirect effects were combined to derive the total effect
4The proportion of the associations between mother’s education and TL attributable to the mediator variables. Mediator variables are education level, physical activity, dietary habit, smoking status, depression score, and PSS of participants