Skip to main content
. 2022 May 2;13:2369. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29803-6

Table 2.

Hole mobility and electron mobility of PM6:BTP-eC9 and PM6:BTP-eC9:L8-BO-F devices with different thicknesses.

Active layer Thickness
(nm)
Hole mobility a (×10−4 cm2 V−1 s−1) Electron mobility
(×10−4 cm2 V−1 s−1)
µh/µe
PM6:BTP-eC9 120 ± 10 7.19 (6.96 ± 0.25) 5.38 (5.15 ± 0.25) 1.34
300 ± 10 9.40 (9.19 ± 0.23) 6.26 (6.01 ± 0.26) 1.50
500 ± 10 11.10 (10.83 ± 0.28) 6.35 (6.13 ± 0.24) 1.75
PM6:BTP-eC9:L8-BO-F 120 ± 10 8.33 (8.06 ± 0.26) 6.67 (6.39 ± 0.26) 1.26
300 ± 10 11.85 (11.59 ± 0.24) 8.51 (8.33 ± 0.20) 1.39
500 ± 10 13.54 (13.33 ± 0.20) 8.55 (8.30 ± 0.22) 1.58
PM6:BTP-eC9:L8-BO-F (LBL) 120 ± 10 8.50 (8.22 ± 0.27) 6.75 (6.50 ± 0.27) 1.26
300 ± 10 12.33 (12.18 ± 0.25) 9.04 (8.82 ± 0.20) 1.36
500 ± 10 14.00 (13.80 ± 0.23) 9.10 (8.91 ± 0.21) 1.54

aAverage values with standard deviation were obtained from 20 devices.