Table 4.
Recommendations for Messaging and Dissemination
| Recommendation | Theme |
|---|---|
| Establish closed loop communication with primary care providers regarding HIV case reports | Theme 1: Context Matters |
| Provide information about MHS to a variety of interventionists and public health service workers | Theme 1: Context Matters |
| Avoid the word "surveillance" in public messaging campaigns regarding MHS and CDR | Theme 2: Making Sense of MHS |
| Messaging should be developed specific to various populations’ needs | Theme 3: Messaging, Equity, and Resource Prioritization |
| Make information about health departments’ use of MHS data widely available to community members and accessible at a diversity of sites and locations (e.g., community meetings, via homeless health care advocates, needle exchange sites, shelters, clinics, and routine HIV testing sites) | Theme 3: Messaging, Equity, and Resource Prioritization |
| Prioritize community education regarding the use of MHS data prior to intervention | Theme 3: Messaging, Equity, and Resource Prioritization |
| Utilize peer educators to share information about MHS | Theme 4: Operationalizing Confidentiality |
| Disease intervention specialists should focus on providing information about the confidential nature of contact with potential cluster members | Theme 4: Operationalizing Confidentiality |
| Share information about the use of biospecimens in the context of MHS at the time of blood draw | Theme 4: Operationalizing Confidentiality |
| Address concerns about unwanted disclosure of one’s HIV status and safety | Theme 5: Stigma, Vulnerability, and Power |
Note. CDR = cluster detection and response; MHS = molecular HIV surveillance.