TABLE 2.

Material properties for the 3D model including the myocardium and saline solution domains.

Parameter		Value	Ref
Electrical model
Myocardium fiber electrical conductivity [S/m]	${\sigma }_f^0$	0.3367	Wang et al. (2001)
Myocardium transverse electrical conductivity [S/m]	${\sigma }_t^0$ , ${\sigma }_n^0$	0.1683	Wang et al. (2001)
Saline solution electrical conductivity [S/m]	σ sol	1.4	Sauerheber and Heinz, (2015)
Myocardium electrical permittivity [F/m]	ɛ myo	3,260	(Gabriel, 1996; Raghavan et al., 2009)
Saline solution electrical permittivity [F/m]	ɛ sol	80	Raghavan et al. (2009)
			Maribo-Mogensen et al. (2013)
			Nörtemann et al. (1997)
Thermal model
Myocardium fiber thermal conductivity [W/m ⋅ K]	$k_f^0$	0.6 a	Končan et al. (2000)
Saline solution thermal conductivity [W/m ⋅ K]	k sol	0.6	Ozbek and Phillips, (1979)
Myocardium heat capacity [J/kg ⋅ K]	$c_{myo}^0$	3,017	Petras et al. (2019)
Saline solution heat capacity [J/kg ⋅ K]	c sol	4,178	Kho et al. (2021)
Myocardium density [kg/m 3]	ρ myo	1,076	Petras et al. (2019)
Saline solution density [kg/m 3]	ρ sol	997	Kho et al. (2021)
Relaxation time heat flux [s]	τ q	8 a	Sahoo et al. (2014)
Relaxation time temperature gradient [s]	τ t	0.045 a	Sahoo et al. (2014)
Cell-death model
Frequency factor N → U [1/s]	A 1	3.68 × 1030	Park et al. (2016)
Frequency factor U → D [1/s]	A 2	5.68 × 103	Park et al. (2016)
Frequency factor U → N [1/s]	A 3	2.58 × 105	Park et al. (2016)
Activation energy N → U [J/mol]	ΔE 1	210, ×, 103	Park et al. (2016)
Activation energy U → D [J/mol]	ΔE 2	38.6 × 103	Park et al. (2016)
Activation energy U → N [J/mol]	ΔE 3	47.2 × 103	Park et al. (2016)

^aParameter included in the parametric analysis.