Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 27;15:125–131. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.03.007

Table 5.

Comparison of treatment responder rates at week 12.

Parameter Treatment NMES (N = 45, PPTC) treatment responder rate Sham low voltage NMES (N = 50, ITT & PP) treatment responder rate P value (chi-square test)
VAS Nominated Activity 71% 62% .348
VAS General 67% 46% .043
WOMAC pain subscale 64% 42% .029
KOOS JR pain subscale 56% 44% .076
WOMAC stiffness subscale 62% 56% .011
KOOS JR stiffness subscale 64% 46% .071

PP, per protocol.