Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 5;9(19):10715–10726. doi: 10.1039/c9ra00787c

Comparison of aquaporin-based biomimetic membranes with some other reported biomimetic thin film composite membranes.

No. Membrane type Feed solution Draw solution Water flux (L m−2 h−1) Reverse salt flux (L m−2 h−1) J s/Jw (g L−1) A (LMH per bar) B (LMH) S (μm) References
1 ABM-1 DI 1 M NaCl 22.31 2.87 0.73 0.08 153 This work
2 ABM-2 DI 1 M NaCl 22.82 3.82 0.87 0.12 188 This work
3 AQP-TFC(Hehqp) flat sheet membrane DI 0.8 M NaCl 5.38 ND ND 5.38 49.26 ND 20
4 AQP-(PA)TFC flat sheet membrane DI 1 M NaCl 23.10 4.4 0.19 6.6 1.7 420 50
5 Aquaporin A/S flat sheet membrane DI 1 M NaCl 2.09 0.07 0.03 ND ND ND 8
6 Aquaporin A/S hollow fibre membrane DI 1 M NaCl 13.2 1.7 0.13 0.43 0.05 210 51
7 AQP-TFC-HF-PEI hollow fibre membrane DI 1 M NaCl 49.1 4.7 0.95 ND ND ND 33
8 PA@Psf/LDH TFNC flat sheet membrane DI 1 M NaCl 18.1 8.1 0.44 0.61 0.27 148 49
9 PES-TFC hollow fibre membrane DI 0.5 M NaCl 18.6 2.0 0.11 3.29 0.11 490 52