Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 19;12:848129. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.848129

Table 3.

Response rates according to the evaluation criteria for two independent radiologists with inter-reader agreement (n = 58).

Tumor response, n (%) RECIST 1.1 mRECIST Choi rChoi
R1 R2 R1 R2 R1 R2 R1 R2
CR 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
PR 6 (10.3) 7 (12.1) 9 (15.5) 11 (19.0) 30 (51.7) 29 (50.0) 12 (20.7) 12 (20.7)
SD 41 (70.7) 39 (67.2) 40 (69.0) 37 (63.8) 16 (27.6) 17 (29.3) 34 (58.6) 34 (58.6)
PD 11 (19.0) 12 (20.7) 9 (15.5) 10 (17.2) 12 (20.7) 12 (20.7) 12 (20.7) 12 (20.7)
Inter-reader agreement, n (%) 56 (96.6) 55 (94.8) 57 (98.3) 58 (100.0)
Weighted k (95% CI) 0.93 (0.51–1.03) 0.90 (0.78–1.01) 0.97 (0.92–1.03) 1.00 (1.00–1.00)

R1, radiologist 1; R2, radiologist 2; CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease.