Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 19;16:836327. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.836327

TABLE 3.

Statistical analysis (p-value) of the proposed AFE-Net compared with other CNN-based methods.

Methods Dsc
AFENet-FCN (Long et al., 2015) < 1E-4
AFENet-DeepLabV3 (Chen et al., 2017) < 1E-4
AFENet-DANet (Fu et al., 2020) < 1E-4
AFENet-GCN (Peng et al., 2017) < 1E-4
AFENet-PSPNet (Zhao et al., 2017) 0.0006
AFENet-U-Net (Ronneberger et al., 2015) < 1E-4
AFENet-Att-UNet (Oktay et al., 2018) 0.0004
AFENet-CE-Net (Gu et al., 2019) 0.0016
AFENet-CPFNet (Feng et al., 2020) < 1E-4
AFENet-UNet++ (Zhou et al., 2018) 0.0055
AFENet-CS2Net (Mou et al., 2021) 0.0001
AFENet-HRSeNet (Wang et al., 2019) < 1E-4
AFENet-UNet + DsSE + MsFF 0.0004
AFENet-TransUNet (Chen et al., 2017) < 1E-4
AFENet-Baseline 0.0019