Skip to main content
. 2022 May 2;22:487. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09614-0

Table 1.

Association between MICAL-L2 expression and clinicopathologic features in the validation cohort

Characteristic levels Low expression of MICALL2 High expression of MICALL2 p
n 227 227
T stage, n (%) T1 4 (0.9%) 7 (1.5%) 0.389
T2 43 (9.5%) 34 (7.5%)
T3 155 (34.2%) 154 (34%)
T4 24 (5.3%) 32 (7.1%)
N stage, n (%) N0 140 (30.8%) 127 (28%) 0.301
N1 52 (11.5%) 53 (11.7%)
N2 35 (7.7%) 47 (10.4%)
M stage, n (%) M0 164 (41.3%) 169 (42.6%) 0.666
M1 34 (8.6%) 30 (7.6%)
Pathologic stage, n (%) Stage I 41 (9.3%) 34 (7.7%) 0.185
Stage II 94 (21.2%) 82 (18.5%)
Stage III 54 (12.2%) 74 (16.7%)
Stage IV 34 (7.7%) 30 (6.8%)
Primary therapy outcome, n (%) PD 10 (4.3%) 15 (6.4%) 0.214
SD 1 (0.4%) 3 (1.3%)
PR 4 (1.7%) 8 (3.4%)
CR 105 (44.7%) 89 (37.9%)
Gender, n (%) Female 104 (22.9%) 110 (24.2%) 0.638
Male 123 (27.1%) 117 (25.8%)
Age, n (%) <=65 100 (22%) 88 (19.4%) 0.295
> 65 127 (28%) 139 (30.6%)
Lymphatic invasion, n (%) NO 137 (33.3%) 111 (27%) 0.048
YES 73 (17.8%) 90 (21.9%)