Skip to main content
. 2022 May 2;22:487. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09614-0

Table 2.

Association between MICAL-L2 expression and clinicopathologic characteristics (logistic regression analysis)

Characteristics Total(N) Odds Ratio (OR) P value
T stage (T3&T4 vs. T1&T2) 453 1.191 (0.748–1.904) 0.462
N stage (N1&N2 vs. N0) 454 1.267 (0.872–1.845) 0.215
M stage (M1 vs. M0) 397 0.856 (0.499–1.463) 0.570
Age (> 65 vs. <=65) 454 1.244 (0.856–1.810) 0.253
Gender (Female vs. Male) 454 1.112 (0.769–1.609) 0.573
Pathologic stage (Stage III&Stage IV vs. Stage I&Stage II) 443 1.375 (0.944–2.008) 0.098
Lymphatic invasion (YES vs. NO) 411 1.522 (1.024–2.268) 0.038
Perineural invasion (YES vs. NO) 179 1.150 (0.585–2.255) 0.684
BMI (> = 25 vs. < 25) 232 0.714 (0.412–1.232) 0.226
Primary therapy outcome (PD&SD&PR vs. CR) 235 2.045 (1.032–4.181) 0.044
Colon polyps present (YES vs. NO) 225 1.073 (0.617–1.860) 0.803