Skip to main content
. 2022 May;33(5):1011–1032. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2021101327

Table 8.

Summary of sodium thiosulfate study characteristics and VC outcome

Author and Year Type of Study Study Duration (months) CKD Status Intervention (Participants at Baseline) Comparator (Participants at Baseline) VC as Primary or Secondary End Point VC Imaging VC Site VC Outcome
Adirekkiat 201082 Non-RCT 4 HD STS post-HD twice weekly, n=16 Dialysis as usual, n=16 Primary CT Coronary artery Less progression with STS
Mathews 201183 Non-RCT 5 HD STS post-HD three times per week, n=22 No control group Primary CT Carotid artery, coronary artery, thoracic arch Less progression with STS
Yonova 201484 Non-RCT 6 HD STS intradialytic, n=6 Controls, n=6 Primary CT Coronary artery Less progression with STS
Yu 201685 RCT 3 HD STS post-HD + calcium carbonate, n=15 Calcium carbonate, n=10 Primary CT Coronary artery Less progression with STS
Saengpanit 201886 RCT 6 HD STS intradialytic twice weekly, n=24 Standard of care, n=26 Secondary CT Coronary artery Less progression with STS
Djuric 202087 RCT 6 HD STS post-HD, n=30 0.9% NaCl during dialysis, n=30 Primary: abdominal aorta, secondary: iliac CT Abdominal aorta, iliac arteries, cardiac valves Less progression with STS at iliac arteries
Bian 202188 RCT 6 HD STS, n=25 Usual treatment, n=25 Primary CT Coronary artery Less progression with STS

HD, hemodialysis; STS, sodium thiosulfate.