Skip to main content
. 2019 May 21;9(28):15997–16006. doi: 10.1039/c9ra02012h

Comparison of molecular sensors for mercury detectiona.

Material Chemical probe LOD Reference
Quantum dots CdS quantum dots 25.2 ng mL−1 Anal. Methods, 2016, 8, 6512–6519
Nitrogen doped carbon dots 0.65 μM New J. Chem., 2018, 42, 6824–6830
Organic molecules Squaraine dye 1.3 × 10−7 M Sens. Actuators, B, 2012, 173, 874–881
Azobenzene 20 μM Chem.–Eur. J., 2011, 17, 7276–7281
Phenoxazinone 100 nM J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 3418–3419
Biomolecules DNA oligonucleotides 40 nM Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 4300–4302
DNA–Au nanoparticles conjugate 10 μM J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 3244–3245
Nanoparticles Gold nanoparticles 10 μM J. Anal. Methods Chem., 2012, 2012
Gold nanoparticles 100 nM Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 4093–4096
Polymers Polythiophene with thymine moiety 30 μM Macromol. Rapid Commun., 2006, 27, 389–392
Poly(3-(3′-N,N,N-triethylamino-1′-propyloxy)-4-methyl-2,5-thiophene hydrochloride) 42 nM Adv. Mater., 2007, 19, 1471–1474
a

LOD = limit of detection.