Comparison of molecular sensors for mercury detectiona.
| Material | Chemical probe | LOD | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantum dots | CdS quantum dots | 25.2 ng mL−1 | Anal. Methods, 2016, 8, 6512–6519 |
| Nitrogen doped carbon dots | 0.65 μM | New J. Chem., 2018, 42, 6824–6830 | |
| Organic molecules | Squaraine dye | 1.3 × 10−7 M | Sens. Actuators, B, 2012, 173, 874–881 |
| Azobenzene | 20 μM | Chem.–Eur. J., 2011, 17, 7276–7281 | |
| Phenoxazinone | 100 nM | J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 3418–3419 | |
| Biomolecules | DNA oligonucleotides | 40 nM | Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 4300–4302 |
| DNA–Au nanoparticles conjugate | 10 μM | J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 3244–3245 | |
| Nanoparticles | Gold nanoparticles | 10 μM | J. Anal. Methods Chem., 2012, 2012 |
| Gold nanoparticles | 100 nM | Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 4093–4096 | |
| Polymers | Polythiophene with thymine moiety | 30 μM | Macromol. Rapid Commun., 2006, 27, 389–392 |
| Poly(3-(3′-N,N,N-triethylamino-1′-propyloxy)-4-methyl-2,5-thiophene hydrochloride) | 42 nM | Adv. Mater., 2007, 19, 1471–1474 |
LOD = limit of detection.