Skip to main content
. 2019 May 21;9(28):15976–15985. doi: 10.1039/c9ra00243j

A comparison of the adsorption capacities of various adsorbents for Hg2+ ions.

S. no Adsorbent q m (mg g−1) Ref.
1 GACa 20.83 50
2 MNPs-DTCb 47.87 51
3 CSTGc 98 52
4 PANI–PSd composite 148 53
5 Mercaptosuccinic acid–LDHe 161 54
6 PAM/ATPf 192 55
7 Glu@h-ZnOg 233 Current work
8 KMS-2h 297 56
9 KMS-1i 377 57
10 MoS4–LDHj 500 18
a

Carboxymethylated granular activated carbon (GAC).

b

Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) of Fe3O4 functionalized by dithiocarbamate (DTC).

c

Chitosan-thioglyceraldehyde Schiff's base cross-linked magnetic resin (CSTG).

d

Polyaniline–polystyrene composite (PANI–PS).

e

Mercaptocarboxylic acid intercalated Mg–Al layered double hydroxide.

f

Polyacrylamide/attapulgite (PAM/ATP).

g

Glutathione-coated hollow ZnO (Glu@h-ZnO).

h

Layered K2MgSn2S6 (KMS-2).

i

Layered metal sulfides (KMS-1).

j

Layered double hydroxide intercalated with the MoS42− ion.