Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 3;9(30):17325–17334. doi: 10.1039/c9ra01891c

Comparison the analytical performances of PG/GCE electrode with other reported electrodes for the determination of Cu2+, Cd2+, and Hg2+a.

Modified electrode Analytes Linear range (μM) LOD (μM) Reference
EDTA-PANI/SWCNTs/SS Cu2+ 1.2–2000 0.08 9
Hg2+ 2–2000 0.68
NH2-MIL-88(Fe)-rGO/GCE Cu2+ 0.005–0.05 0.0036 7c
Cd2+ 0.005–0.3 0.0049
RGO/Bi/CPE Cu2+ 0.3125–1.5625 0.406 8
Cd2+ 0.1785–1.0714 0.025
Alk-Ti3C2/GCE Cu2+ 0.1–1.5 0.032 20
Cd2+ 0.1–1.5 0.098
Hg2+ 0.1–1.5 0.130
Pd/PAC/GCE Cu2+ 0.5–5.0 0.066 22
Cd2+ 0.5–5.5 0.041
Hg2+ 0.24–7.5, 0.054
NG/GCE Cu2+ 0.01–5 0.005 7d
Cd2+ 0.05–1000 0.05
Hg2+ 0.2–9 0.05
PG/GCE Cu2+ 0.25–5.5 0.024 This work
Cd2+ 0.25–5.5 0.015
Hg2+ 0.25–5.5 0.032
a

EDTA: ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. SS: stainless steel. Alk-Ti3C2: alkaline-Ti3C2. PAC: porous activated carbons. NG: N-doped graphene.