Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 26;24:57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsacl.2022.04.002

Table 1.

Impact of SIL-IS concentration and isotope selection on assay accuracy. Accuracy (expressed as % average difference from the weighed-in concentration) of flucloxacillin controls with both SIL-IS isotopes, (m/z 458 → 160 and 460 → 160), at 0.7, 7 and 14 mg/L concentrations, analysed on Waters and Shimadzu systems, (n = 4).

SIL-IS = 0.7 mg/L SIL-IS = 14 mg/L SIL-IS = 7 mg/L
Waters Instrument Shimadzu Instrument Waters Instrument Shimadzu Instrument Waters Instrument
QC (mg/L) Mean ± SD % Diff Mean ± SD % Diff Mean ± SD % Diff Mean ± SD % Diff Mean ± SD % Diff
(m/z 458 → 160)
2.5 3.11 ± 0.24 24.4 2.87 ± 0.26 14.7 2.65 ± 0.03 5.8 2.65 ± 0.04 6.0 2.55 ± 0.07 2.0
20 27.37 ± 0.83 36.9 26.70 ± 1.18 33.5 21.1 ± 0.48 5.4 20.8 ± 0.25 4.1 20.15 ± 0.57 0.8
200 141.57 ± 2.46 −29.2 138.68 ± 4.79 −30.7 194.7 ± 3.24 −2.6 197.6 ± 2.82 −1.2 169.3 ± 3.75 −15.4
(m/z 460 → 160)
2.5 2.85 ± 0.22 13.9 2.74 ± 0.15 9.4 2.61 ± 0.07 4.3 2.67 ± 0.08 6.7 2.61 ± 0.07 4.3
20 19.90 ± 0.99 −0.5 20.61 ± 1.50 3.0 20.3 ± 0.30 1.3 20.1 ± 0.18 0.3 19.53 ± 0.45 −2.4
200 192.28 ± 9.44 −3.9 197.79 ± 12.77 −1.1 206.9 ± 6.57 3.4 206.2 ± 2.20 2.6 194.4 ± 5.10 −2.8