Table 2.

HD95, ASD/mDTA and DSC comparison results on the MICCAI’15 set. Bold font indicates the best performing model. Dashes indicate that results for the OAR are not reported. *Kawahara et al. reported a single DSC for the parotids.

OAR	Brainstem	Mandible	Left Parotid	Right Parotid
HD95 (mm)
Gao et al. [6]	2.32 ± 0.70	1.08 ± 0.45	1.81 ± 0.43	2.43 ± 2.00
Gou et al. [7]	2.98 ± 0.61	1.40 ± 0.02	3.48 ± 1.28	3.15 ± 0.67
Ours	2.83 ± 1.05	1.00 ± 0.73	2.87 ± 0.89	3.55 ± 1.35
ASD/ mDTA (mm)
Huang et al. [4]	1.28 ± 0.45	0.56 ± 0.27	0.86 ± 0.24	1.02 ± 0.38
Gou et al. [7]	1.19 ± 0.16	0.47 ± 0.11	1.21 ± 0.34	1.14 ± 0.22
Ours	0.81 ± 0.31	0.20 ± 0.08	0.77 ± 0.14	0.81 ± 0.28
DSC
Huang et al. [4]	87.9 ± 2.4	91.6 ± 2.1	88.4 ± 1.5	87.8 ± 2.0
Zhang et al. [5]	91 ± 2	95 ± 3	87 ± 3	87 ± 7
Gao et al. [6]	88.2 ± 2.5	94.7 ± 1.1	89.8 ± 1.6	88.1 ± 4.2
Gou et al. [7]	88 ± 2	94 ± 1	87 ± 3	86 ± 5
Kawahara et al. [27]	88	-	81*	81*
Ours	88.3 ± 3.6	93.4 ± 1.9	88.6 ± 1.6	87.2 ± 3.1