TEM |
xy: 2 nm |
60–80 nm |
Ultrastructure of the tissue at a nanometer resolution, morphology of junctions, relationship with the actin cytoskeleton, measuring intermembrane space |
Some technical handling and sample preparation optimization |
Not possible |
Correlation with LM possible |
Easily accessible and widely used |
FFEM and PREM possible |
ET |
xy: 2 nm |
Up to 300 nm |
Filament arrangement within junctions, binding interactions between substructures, quantitative measurements |
Some technical handling and sample preparation optimization |
Not possible |
Easily accessible and widely used |
VEM (including SBF-SEM and FIB-SEM) |
xy: up to 5 nm |
Up to 20 µm per day |
Junctions and ultrastructure in volume, quantification possible, relationship between different junctions and its localization on the membrane surface |
Technically demanding and sample preparation optimization necessary |
Not possible |
z: up to 5 nm |
Limited availability, expensive machines |
SXT |
xy: 10–50 nm |
10 µm |
Junctions at a nanometer resolution in the near-native state and possible to reconstruct the ultrastructure of the cell in 3D; Correlation with LM possible |
Technically demanding and sample preparation optimization necessary |
Not possible |
z: 10–50 nm |
Limited availability because need for synchrotron |
Immuno-EM |
Same as TEM |
Same as TEM |
Individual proteins and the ultrastructure of the sample in a nanometer resolution |
Some technical handling and sample preparation optimization |
Not possible |
Easily accessible and widely used |