Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2022 Apr 1;67(8):10.1088/1361-6560/ac5f6e. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac5f6e

Table 5.

Comparison of patient-specific models with different loss functions. Green columns highlight features of the L1+VGG+GAN model that have improvements over the L1 model.

ID Model 1. Median 2. Glcm clustershade 3. LLH range 4. LHL totalenergy 5. HLL skewness 6. LLL max 7. LoG 3mm skewness 8. LoG 5mm skewness 9. LoG 3mm glcm inverse difference 10. LoG 5mm rlgl short run emphasis
1 Original CBCT 8.51 0.35 0.19 0.01 0.68 4.29 0.37 0.50 0.14 0.03
L1 0.71 0.73 0.08 0.01 0.26 0.18 0.29 0.73 0.04 0.01
L1+VGG+GAN 1.30 0.38 0.03 0.01 0.35 0.50 0.10 0.86 0.03 0.01
2 Original CBCT 0.85 0.75 0.16 0.01 0.43 13.61 4.29 17.29 0.02 0.02
L1 0.37 0.39 0.23 0.01 0.65 0.83 1.64 4.91 0.03 0.01
L1+VGG+GAN 0.32 0.52 0.23 0.01 0.70 1.14 2.42 10.99 0.03 0.01
3 Original CBCT 8.49 0.20 0.60 0.00 0.78 1.91 0.58 0.52 0.39 0.04
L1 0.13 0.61 0.17 0.00 0.10 0.28 0.30 0.27 0.05 0.01
L1+VGG+GAN 0.85 0.16 0.11 0.00 0.07 0.16 0.33 0.45 0.06 0.01
4 Original CBCT 4.68 0.59 0.68 0.00 0.86 1.25 0.66 0.44 0.43 0.18
L1 0.51 0.10 0.10 0.00 1.20 0.09 0.13 0.02 0.07 0.00
L1+VGG+GAN 0.35 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.67 0.75 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.01