Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 May 4.
Published in final edited form as: Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom. 2018 Mar 18;1866(7):831–839. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2018.03.006

Table 4A.

The TIMBER-K and TIMBER-N arms of the study were divided into treatment subgroups using the basal DSR plasma concentration of 3.5 μM. The arms were divided into “high” DSR subgroups (≥3.5 μM), TIMBER-K(H) and TIMBER-P(H) and “normal” DSR subgroups (< 3.5 μM), TIMBER-K(N) and TIMBER-P(N). The effect of Ket on basal DSR plasma concentrations at the end of the Ket infusion (40 min DSR) was examined by the determination of the percent change (%) of DSR concentration in each subject.

Groups Subject Basal DSR (μM) PCL Baseline Response (days) 40 min DSR (μM) Percent change (%)
TIMBER-K (H) 3 3.5 80 27 2.7 −21
4 5.0 82 21 3.5 −30
9 6.2 81 20 4.7 −25
Mean ± SD 4.9 ± 1.4 81.0 ± 1.0 22.7 ± 3.8 3.6 ± 1.0 25 ± 5
TIMBER-K (N) 1 3.2 76 71 2.8 −14
16 3.3 70 55 2.4 −7
18 1.4 78 48 1.3 −3
20 1.6 67 29 1.5 −3
13 2.6 75 25 3.1 +8
17 3.0 67 14 2.6 −14
Mean ± SD 2.5 ± 0.8 72.2 ± 4.8 40.3 ± 21.3 2.3 ± 0.7 8 ± 6
TIMBER-P (H) 11 3.6 60 15 3.1 −14
15 4.5 75 8 4.2 −5
5 5.0 76 14 4.3 −14
6 5.4 77 4 4.8 −11
2 6.1 77 12 5.7 −7
Mean ± SD 4.9 ± 0.9 73.0 ± 7.3 10.6 ± 4.6 4.4 ± 0.9 10 ± 4
TIMBER-P (N) 19 1.5 76 21 1.3 −15
12 1.6 66 4 1.4 −12
10 2.3 62 28 1.9 −16
14 2.3 75 18 2.2 −3
7 3.2 60 41 2.7 −14
Mean ± SD 2.2 ± 0.7 67.8 ± 7.4 22.4 ± 13.9 1.9 ± 0.6 12 ± 5