Skip to main content
. 2022 May 4;5(5):e2210464. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.10464

Table 3. Association of Covariables With Pump Uptake in Québec and Manitoba Including Ethnicity.

Variable Adjusted HR (95% CI)a P value
Québecb
Age at study entry 0.95 (0.94-0.96) <.001
Deprivation
Material 0.90 (0.86-0.94) <.001
Social 0.95 (0.91-0.99) .02
Ethnic concentration 0.90 (0.86-0.95) <.001
Male 1.00 (0.89-1.13) >.99
Urban residence 1.09 (0.91-1.31) .95
Diagnosis era
Early program vs preprogram 1.44 (1.24-1.68) <.001
Late program vs preprogram 1.50 (1.29-1.75) <.001
Manitobac
Age at study entry 0.99 (0.94-1.04) .65
Deprivation
Material 0.75 (0.63-0.90) .002
Social 0.88 (0.75-1.02) .078
Ethnic concentration 0.98 (0.71-1.35) .89
Male sex 0.82 (0.56-1.22) .33
Urban residence 1.04 (0.64-1.69) .88
Diagnosis era
Early program vs preprogram 5.97 (3.32-10.75) <.001
Late program vs preprogram 3.69 (1.57-8.62) .003

Abbreviation: HR, hazard ratio.

a

Adjusted multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis model includes the following covariates: age at study entry, material and social deprivation indices as continuous variables, ethnicity (CAN-Marg ethnic concentration index as continuous variable), sex, rurality, and diagnosis era.

b

Twenty additional individuals with missing or unavailable CAN-Marg ethno-cultural composition index; thus, the remaining cohort included 1055 children who used a pump users and 1844 who did not use a pump.

c

Twenty-six additional individuals with missing or unavailable CAN-Marg ethno-cultural composition index; thus, the remaining cohort included 102 children who used a pump users and 508 who did not use a pump.