In the original article, there was a mistake in Supplementary Figure S45C as published. The panel erroneously included peak 83. The corrected figure is available in Supplementary Material.
In the original article, there was an error in listing some of the compounds in the Results and Discussion section, which were erroneously included in this section. A correction has been made in Results and Discussion, “UPLC-PDA-Q/TOF-MS Analysis of the Saikosaponins Extract of BC and BMW”:
“The same sample processing and UPLC-PDA-Q/TOF-MS detection methods were applied to identify saikosaponins of BC and BMW, which were then compared with BMS, to explore the similarities and differences of saikosaponins from three Bupleurum species. As shown in Supplementary Figure S45, except for a few individual saikosaponins (compounds 15 and 96 were not found in BC, compounds 15, 83 and 96 were not found in BMW), the saikosaponins in BMS were almost the same as those in BC and BMW, which have a material basis as an alternative variety of BC and BMW.”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2022.867617/full#supplementary-material
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.