Skip to main content
. 2022 May 1;28:e935340-1–e935340-9. doi: 10.12659/MSM.935340

Supplementary Table 4.

Results of sensitivity analyses examining association between MA and CHD.

Matching method Caliper No (%) of CHD patients OR (95% CI) p value
The nearest-neighbor Mahalanobis matching with replacement 0.20 48 (41.4%) 1.13 (1.02–1.26) 0.03
0.25 49 (41.9%) 1.15 (1.03–1.29) 0.01
NA 51 (43.2%) 1.15 (1.04–1.30) 0.01
The 1: 1 nearest-neighbor matching 0.20 45 (37.2%) 1.15 (1.03–1.29) 0.01
0.25 46 (36.8%) 1.14 (1.03–1.28) 0.02
NA 51 (37.5%) 1.13 (1.02–1.25) 0.02

NA=matching without a caliper. Matched factors included age, sex, the year of physical examination and medication history (antiplatelet drug and lipid-lowering drug). Models were adjusted for age, sex, the year of physical examination. CI – confidence interval; CHD – coronary heart disease; MA – maximum amplitude; OR – odds ratio.