Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 21;9(45):26263–26275. doi: 10.1039/c9ra04225c

Comparison of immobilized methods for anammox bacteria retentiona.

Start-up (day) Dominant genera Biomass (gVSS L−1) NRRs (kg N m−3 d−1) Reactor type Temp (°C) Biomass retention Reference
100 Ca. J. caeni 3.80 8.20 CSTR 33 Immobilize gel 45
100 Not reported 0.10 4.40 CSTR 30 Immobilize gel 46
67 Ca. J. caeni 0.55 3.70 CSTR 36 Immobilize gel 47
180 Mixed sludge 0.32 1.69 CSTR 34 Immobilize gel 48
65 Ca. J. caeni 1.34 3.80 CSTR 30 Immobilize gel 49
85 NR 11.33 NR UASB 30 Bamboo char 50
75 Ca. Brocadia 4.90 NR CAMBR 13 Hollow fiber 51
90 Ca. Jettenia 4.90 NR CAMBR 13 Hollow fiber 51
63 Ca. Kuenenia 3.52 0.92 UPPAR 35 Porous plate This study
a

CSTR, continuous stirred tank reactor; UASB, upflow anaerobic sludge blanket; CAMBR, combined ABR and MBR; NR, not reported.