Table 6.
Correlation matrix of DOI constructs vs E-Health adoption
| Constructs | Mean | SD | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) REL | 3.98 | 0.79 | – | ||||
| (2) COM1 | 4.05 | 0.84 | 0.791** | – | |||
| (3) COM2 | 3.48 | 0.88 | –0.224* | –0.094 | – | ||
| (4) TRI | 3.42 | 0.71 | 0.407** | 0.514** | 0.050 | – | |
| (5) OBS | 3.66 | 0.83 | 0.745** | 0.747** | –0.106 | 0.550** | – |
| (6) DEP | 7.73 | 2.28 | 0.499** | 0.476** | –0.427** | 0.406** | 0.521** |
*p<0.05; **p<0.01.
Independent variables: COM1, compatibility; COM2, complexity; DEP, the dependent variable, adoption of E-Health; OBS, observability; REL, relative advantage; TRI, trialability.