Abstract
Background
Tanzania has approximately 40 000 newborn deaths per year, with >25% of these linked to intrapartum-related hypoxia. The Helping Babies Breathe© and Golden minute© (HBB©) programme was developed to teach skilled intervention for non-breathing neonates at birth. While Helping Babies Breathe© and Golden minute©, providing training in simulated bag and mask ventilation, is theoretically successful in the classroom, it often fails to transfer to clinical practice without further support. Furthermore, the proclivity of midwives to suction excessively as a first-line intervention is an ingrained behaviour that delays ventilation, contributing to very early neonatal deaths.
Methods
The ‘champion’ programme provided guided instruction during a real-life resuscitation. The site was Amana Hospital, Tanzania. The labour ward conducts 13 500 deliveries annually, most of which are managed by midwives. Brief mannikin simulation practice was held two to three times a week followed by bedside hands-on training (HOT) of bag and mask skills and problem solving while reinforcing the mantra of ‘air, air, air’ as the first-line intervention during a real-life emergency.
Results
Champion midwives (trainers) guided instructions given during a real emergency at the bedside caused learners beliefs to change. Trainees observed changes in baby skin colour and the onset of spontaneous breathing after effective ventilation.
Conclusions
Visible success during an actual real-life emergency created confidence, mastery and collective self-efficacy.
Keywords: collective self-efficacy, midwife, neonatal resuscitation, training, transferring clinical skills
Introduction
Tanzania has approximately 40 000 newborn deaths per year,1 with >25% of these deaths linked to intrapartum-related hypoxia.2 The Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) programme was developed to address this problem. Tanzania was part of the global rollout in 2009 and saw a significant 47% reduction in very early neonatal deaths (VENDs) within 24 h.3 However, simulated bag and mask ventilation (BMV) skills have failed to transfer to clinical practice.4 Furthermore, the proclivity of midwives to excessively deeply suction the baby's oropharynx is an ingrained behaviour that delays ventilation, contributing to VENDs. The problem was that despite passing traditional HBB training, the transfer of bag and mask clinical skills was not evident. Immediate return to the use of suction as the first-line intervention for a non-breathing neonate was a barrier that was challenging to overcome.
The ‘champion’ midwife programme (Figure 1) was developed at Amana Hospital, Tanzania to train midwives in effective skilled neonatal resuscitation. The key components were hands-on training (HOT) during a real-life emergency resuscitation on a non-breathing baby in the labour ward with a skilled champion instructor at the bedside after brief BMV skills instruction on a mannikin. The mantra of ‘air, air, air’ rather than suction as the first-line intervention was reinforced in the classroom and in the ward. Eight local midwives were trained as champions and carried out HOT resuscitation training at the bedside during the study period. A training report in August 2021 highlighted that this training is being delivered two to three times per week by local champion midwives, suggesting the long-term sustainability of the project.
The aim of this research was to explore what empowers midwives to perform skilled neonatal resuscitation in Tanzania. The overarching aim was to save the lives of babies who fail to breathe at birth.
Methods
Setting
The study was performed at Amana Hospital in Tanzania, with a catchment area of approximately 1 million, plus outlying hospitals that refer patients. Midwives manage the majority of the 13 500 deliveries annually. Often the workload is overwhelming and the midwives neonatal resuscitation skills are limited.
Resources and equipment vary. On many days, electricity, running water and hand soap are not reliably available. There is a limited or nil supply of sterile gloves and basic medications, which is a problem in many facilities in sub-Saharan Africa.
Problem
Upon entering the labour ward during a morning shift in 2017, authors JB and CB saw six babies who had died overnight on a bench labelled ‘dead baby’. This was the catalyst for creating solutions to reduce VENDs.
JB and CB observed that despite passing the HBB assessments, within minutes of re-entering the labour ward, midwives reverted to prolonged deep suctioning for birth asphyxiated babies. This propensity to be engrossed in deep suctioning appeared to be so ingrained as a core practice that despite updated training and skills, most midwives rarely utilized BMV. When they did, it was too late to assist the baby in breathing or having any chance of survival.3
Mastery of BMV skills after HBB training on mannikins did not translate into clinical practice.3 The midwives’ resuscitation skills were inadequate or were not used at all, despite passing both the written and practical simulation tests. Current and initial research on the HBB programme in sub-Saharan Africa highlighted the difficulty of transferring simulated neonatal BMV skills into clinical practice.4 However, some studies have utilized low-dose, high-frequency mannikin training drill practice, the formal appointment of mentors who teach simulation sessions, the development of mannikin training guides and structured on-the-job training, master trainer mentoring via phone and e-mail and peer-to-peer learning. One study in Rwanda cited clinical mentorship as a critical element in the reduction in birth-asphyxiated neonates being admitted to the neonatal unit.5 However, no studies have utilized bedside HOT resuscitation to guide clinical skills mastery, the key element of the champion programme.
Solution
The champion programme was developed based on Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory (see Figure 1), with the cornerstone of the programme being integrated practical HOT during a real-life emergency neonatal resuscitation and troubleshooting, fully supported at the beside by a skilled instructor. The intervention was developed to create or enhance self-efficacy, with the goal of empowering midwives to perform an appropriate resuscitation and achieve BMV mastery.
To engage local midwives, the solution had to be clinically and culturally relevant. The labour ward instruction is frequent (two to three times per week) to capture the fundamentals in a short timeframe (5–15 min) at opportune times for midwives to practise BMV skills on a mannikin. The availability of these materials has helped reduce stress and nervousness, as individual learning needs are integrated into hands-on resuscitation.
The champion midwife (trainer) is a vital element that enables real-time, reinforced practical skills transfer and common resuscitation troubleshooting. Time-critical, clinically based, hands-on instruction builds belief, confidence and mastery. The mentor utilizes verbal persuasion and vicarious experience while providing the trainee with the tools to manage emotional arousal.
The training goal was shifted from a focus on the trainee to a faithful concentration on the neonate's ventilation within the golden minute (see Table 1).
Table 1.
Session | Approach | Social Cognitive Theory element/area |
---|---|---|
Session 1 | Introducing the champion programme: a clinically skilled mentor guides and instructs the trainee through hands-on training (HOT)1 during a real-life emergency neonatal resuscitation conducted by the mentor | Verbal persuasion |
Classroom or in the labour ward at the mannikin setup area (cold education) (1–5 min) | Verbally convey the important points of successful resuscitation: an unequivocal focus on the golden minute to help the baby breathe; warm, dry, stimulate; and bag and mask—air, air, air. Provide the trainee with the HBB second edition workbook in the preferred language. At each session, highlight areas in the workbook to review at home. |
|
Session 2 | Simulation of clinical skills with a mentor (skilled midwife) demonstrating the use of bag and mask and basic resuscitation on a mannikin set up in the labour ward providing opportune training when there is a break in deliveries. | Vicarious experience |
Clinical skills (5–10 min) | Highlight and repeat at every session: prepare the bag and mask for every delivery; initial actions—warm, dry, stimulate; and if not breathing, then BMV—air, air, air. Follow the demonstration with analysis and discussion with the midwife, creating a positive interplay for open discussion |
Mastery |
Session 3 | The labour ward after watching a mentor during HOT resuscitation | Self-appraisal of psychological state |
Transfer of clinical skills (5 min) (HOT education) | Having a trainee stand beside the champion midwife to see first-hand the changes in the baby's colour, tone and breathing. Guiding the midwife through the impact of her own feelings and thoughts. Highlighting the emotional connection and identifying feelings of anxiousness, panic and fear. Assisting the midwife to gain insight into the trainees skills and learning modalities. Instilling the courage to try. |
Identifying responses and emotional reactions |
Session 4 | In the labour ward, the midwife resuscitates with BMV | Verbal persuasion |
Clinical skills in the labour ward | Provide feedback and debriefing after HOT during a real-life neonatal emergency resuscitation in the labour ward with BMV | Vicarious experience |
Repeat up to four or five times (1–5 min) | Expanding the trainee's knowledge for mastery of BMV: foetal heart monitoring and use of the partogram to assess labour, delay cord clamping, care for thermoregulation, infection prevention measures and immediate breastfeeding if the baby is breathing normally after resuscitation | Self-appraisal, emotional arousal, which assists the cognitive phase, and mastery |
Session 5 (5–10 min) | Biweekly BMV skills in the labour ward taught by the mentor on a mannikin, with clinical skills transfer being monitored by the mentor. | Mastery vicarious experience |
1HOT resuscitation is hands-on training during a real-life neonatal resuscitation emergency with the guided and full support of a clinically skilled midwife (champion) to instruct, encourage and provide real-time troubleshooting and hands-on support. HOT also implies the emotional arousal, urgency and intensity of both the training and the situation managing a non-breathing floppy blue baby who requires immediate focused skilled intervention. HOT resuscitation is more than mentorship. It is a deep-seated commitment made by the champion midwife and trainee to the golden minute, to the neonate and to the skills required to successfully care for a non-breathing neonate at birth. The totally dedicated champion is there to pass on clinical skills to the trainees and to build confidence and hope.
Seasonal differences do not appear to affect the champion programme; however, additional training, which covers topics that complement the champion programme and address maternal factors that can affect neonatal outcomes is held weekly and intrapartum-related hypoxia may impact outcomes outside the champion programme.
One of the programme's significant aspects is the emphasis on and reinforcement of the fact that the midwives are the baby's only ‘champion’. The midwife pledges to be resolute and to concentrate on the baby for 1 min at delivery.
Mentorship, another component in this study, consists of ongoing support to champion midwives using e-mail and WhatsApp via smartphones that has aided in maintaining momentum and a long-term commitment to the sustainability of this programme (see Table 2).
Table 2.
Key lessons learned |
---|
1. Teaching and learning need to be moved from the training room to the bedside, where seeing real success (baby alive after resuscitation) builds self-confidence in midwives and creates further champions. |
2. There must be a focus on unlearning harmful techniques that may be ingrained in daily practice. Doing so is not an easy process. However, it is doable but requires persistence. |
3. Mentors can create frequent opportunities for immediate feedback by focusing on BMV as the first-line intervention after stimulation (positive changes in terms of confidence can be seen). Mentors guide the trainees through live (HOT resuscitation) real-time troubleshooting. |
The long-term relationships formed by the original champion midwives, JB and CB, by working together with local midwives for many years have created a platform of trust, accountability and hope. Furthermore, a sustained commitment to mentoring by JB and CB to the champions who deliver this programme appears to have created collective self-efficacy and pride in being part of preventing stillbirths and VENDs.
Sources of information and data
Evaluation data were collected via observations and semi-structured interviews (from July 2019 to August 2020) with midwives who had worked in the labour ward for a minimum of 6 months full-time, had experienced VENDs, had completed the champion programme and had conducted a minimum of three neonatal resuscitations. The researchers documented insights into the champion programme and midwife empowerment. As of 2021, the programme continues with champion midwives delivering training and providing guidance for new midwives and supervision of HOT resuscitation.
Results
Approximately 62% (n=13) of the original midwives in the labour ward became the initial champions. The change in suctioning habits was the most difficult to teach. One midwife expressed the issue as follows:
‘Past years, I'm always using this suction tube to suck and suck and suck and suck, but nowadays, I rarely suck, and now, in my labour ward, I have not even had a suction machine for almost one year, and it is not affecting me.’ —Mkunga_02
HOT in the labour ward was regarded positively. It was the most influential component of the champion training.
‘On-the-job training is more effective than classroom. Because you teach them in a class once a week and when they come back to the labour ward you get the baby who needs resuscitation, you can teach them through live baby’. — Mkunga_02
They observed a change from blue to pink in the skin colour of the baby. This feedback increased their confidence and self-efficacy and transformed the participating midwives into champions.
Clinical outcomes
An excerpt from the training report highlights the clinical implications of HOT training.
‘For the staff, they are now up-to-date on the use of bag and mask rather than the penguin and on advanced resuscitation’.
‘We have better outcomes, as we now use bedside resuscitation, and we shout to prepare for resuscitation before delivery’.
‘Training is three to four times a week, and other days, mentorship is conducted. On each shift, no one needs to have an asphyxiated baby.’ —Champion Training Report July 2021
Based on observations by the local midwives and communication with the researchers, there are fewer admissions to the neonatal unit for birth asphyxia and fewer babies are being placed on the ‘dead baby’ bench.
Limitations
Initially, eight champion midwives were trained. These early adopters have continued to lead in creating collective self-efficacy. However, it may not be possible to duplicate this at another site due to a lack of long-term relationships with the staff. Furthermore, not all midwives may learn effectively with high levels of arousal and stress, which may cause HOT resuscitation training to be ineffective.
Conclusions
A champion programme must first have one or two committed mentors/champions. Creating champions can be a challenging process if only classroom-based education is available. The champion programme created confidence and mastery. The mantra of ‘air, air, air’ focuses trainees on ventilation in the classroom and at the bedside. Frequent labour ward training based on HOT resuscitation enhanced individual and collective self-efficacy among local midwives. Persistence, troubleshooting and real-life bedside teaching create an immediate feedback loop for the learners. Similar programs can empower midwifes to master new skills that can improve clinical delivery, instil hope and reduce VENDs in low-resource settings.
Contributor Information
Jan Becker, Midwife Vision Global Ltd, Tanzania, Senior Clinical Midwife, Director; University of the Sunshine Coast, QLD, Australia; Member in the General Division of the Order of Australia.
Chiung-Jung (Jo) Wu, University of the Sunshine Coast, 1 Moreton Bay Parade, Petrie QLD 4502, Australia.
Chase Becker, University of Nicosia, Medical School, Makedonitissis 46, Nicosia 2417 Cyprus.
James Moir, Suite 1, Nucleus Medical Suites, 23 Elsa Wilson Drive, Buderim QLD 4556, Australia.
Marion Gray, University of the Southern Queensland, 37 Sinnathamby Blvd, Springfield Central QLD 4300, Australia.
Meshak Shimwela, Temeke Regional Referral Hospital, Temeke Road Adjacent Sterio market, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.
Florin Oprescu, University of Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Dr, Sippy Downs QLD 4556, Australia.
Authors’ contributions
JB and CB were responsible for the study conception and design and data collection. JB, CB, C-JW, JM and FO were responsible for data analysis. JB, CB, C-JW and FO were responsible for drafting the manuscript. JB, CB, C-JW, JM, MG, MS and FO were responsible for manuscript appraisal and editing and approved the final version and submission.
Acknowledgements
Thank you to the midwives who generously participated in this study. Special thanks are given to Matron Beauty, for her support in conducting this study and believing in the midwives who deliver the care.
Funding
None.
Competing interests
Midwife Vision Global (MWVG) NGO provided Laerdal Neonatal Bag and Mask equipment and built the midwifery training clinic at Amana Hospital. MWVG NGO continues to support the OB/GYN department at Amana Hospital with resuscitation equipment and resources.
Ethical approval
This study received ethics approval from the National Institute for Medical Research, Tanzania (NIMR/HQ/R.8a/Vol. IX/2828) and the Human Research Ethics Committee at the University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia (S191339). Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Data availability statement
The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the National Institute for Medical Research, Tanzania, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, thus they are not publicly available. The data are available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission from the National Institute for Medical Research.
References
- 1. Moshiro R, Perlman JM, Mdoe Pet al. . Potential causes of early death among admitted newborns in a rural Tanzanian hospital. PLoS One. 2019;14(10):e0222935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Moshiro R, Ersdal HL, Mdoe Pet al. . Factors affecting effective ventilation during newborn resuscitation: a qualitative study among midwives in rural Tanzania. Glob Health Action. 2018;11(1):1423862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Msemo G, Massawe A, Mmbando Det al. . Newborn mortality and fresh stillbirth rates in Tanzania after helping babies breathe training. Pediatrics. 2013;131(2):e353–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Ersdal HL, Vossius C, Bayo Eet al. . A one-day “Helping Babies Breathe” course improves simulated performance but not clinical management of neonates. Resuscitation. 2013;84(10):1422–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Umunyana J, Sayinzoga F, Ricca Jet al. . A practice improvement package at scale to improve management of birth asphyxia in Rwanda: A before-After mixed methods evaluation. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20:583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Wu C. J. J., Chang A. M.. Application of a theoretical framework to foster a cardiac-diabetes self-management programme. International Nursing Review. 2014;61(3):336. doi:10.1111/inr.12104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the National Institute for Medical Research, Tanzania, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, thus they are not publicly available. The data are available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission from the National Institute for Medical Research.