Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 16;152(5):1336–1346. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxac034

TABLE 3.

Impact of SELEVER on the probability of adequate intakes of vitamin A, iron, and zinc, on the mean probability of adequacy and on IDDS, in caregivers and index children1

Round 2 Round 3 Treatment vs. control Round 2 Round 3 SELEVER vs. control SELEVER + WASH vs. control SELEVER + WASH vs. SELEVER
Characteristic Control Treatment Control Treatment Δ P value SELEVER SELEVER + WASH SELEVER SELEVER + WASH Δ P value Δ P value Δ P value
Caregivers n = 339 n = 673 n = 326 n = 630 n = 343 n = 330 n = 328 n = 302
 Energy intake, kcal/d 2007 ± 929 2151 ± 886 2127 ± 1163 2144 ± 984 63.7 0.56 2103 ± 878 2201 ± 893 2109 ± 885 2182 ± 1081 3.9 0.97 126 0.33 122 0.20
 PA vitamin A, % 0.47 ± 5.1 0.57 ± 4.7 0.53 ± 5.8 0.49 ± 3.4 0.25 0.23 0.29 ± 2.6 0.85 ± 6.2 0.58 ± 4.3 0.39 ± 2.0 0.33 0.32 0.17 0.35 −0.16 0.64
 PA iron, % 44 ± 10 43 ± 10 38 ± 10 37 ± 11 1.8 0.030* 43 ± 11 43 ± 10 36 ± 12 38 ± 10 1.7 0.059 1.9 0.035* 0.2 0.78
 PA zinc, % 72 ± 40 64 ± 41 69 ± 42 64 ± 42 −2.0 0.25 60 ± 42 68 ± 40 60 ± 43 69 ± 41 −4.0 0.052 0.09 0.96 4.1 0.038*
 MPA, % 22± 5.6 22 ± 5.9 20 ± 7.0 20± 6.9 0.37 0.48 21± 6.0 22± 5.8 19 ± 7.1 20 ± 6.5 0.034 0.95 0.70 0.21 0.67 0.17
 IDDS,2 food groups 3.6 ± 0.94 3.6 ± 0.99 3.7 ± 0.96 3.8 ± 1.0 −0.060 0.59 3.6 ± 1.0 3.6 ± 0.99 3.8 ± 1.0 3.7 ± 1.0 −0.020 0.87 −0.10 0.49 −0.081 0.60
Index children n = 342 n = 676 n = 321 n = 623 n = 345 n = 331 n = 326 n = 297
 Energy intake, kcal/d 1292 ± 628 1368 ± 574 1512 ± 669 1494 ± 642 5.4 0.9 1359 ± 562 1378 ± 588 1455 ± 627 1536 ± 656 −31 0.60 46 0.53 77 0.23
 PA vitamin A, % 11 ± 23 12 ± 25 6.5 ± 19 7.1 ± 18 0.82 0.58 11 ± 23 13 ± 26 7.1 ± 19 7.2 ± 18 0.64 0.69 1.0 0.54 0.37 0.79
 PA iron, % 90 ± 15 90 ± 15 84 ± 23 83 ± 24 −1.4 0.5 91 ± 14 90 ± 16 83 ± 24 82 ± 24 0.38 0.86 −3.3 0.21 −3.7 0.17
 PA zinc, % 100 ± 0.90 100 ± 1.6 94 ± 16 93 ± 16 −1.4 0.38 100 ± 2.2 100 ± 0.70 94 ± 17 93 ± 16 −0.17 0.90 −2.7 0.27 −2.5 0.29
 MPA, % 53 ± 10 53 ± 11 45 ± 14 45 ± 14 −0.34 0.77 53 ± 11 53 ± 11 45 ± 14 45 ± 15 0.30 0.81 −1.0 0.48 −1.3 0.36
 IDDS,2 food groups 3.6 ± 0.96 3.6 ± 1.0 3.8 ± 0.95 3.8 ± 1.0 −0.048 0.63 3.6 ± 1.0 3.7 ± 1.0 3.9 ± 1.0 3.8 ± 0.99 −0.036 0.76 −0.062 0.61 −0.025 0.85
1

Descriptive values are unadjusted means with standard deviation. Δ is the linear regression coefficient and represents the change in the outcome in a group compared with another group, as indicated in column headers. It is expressed in the same unit as the outcome or, when the unit is a percentage, it is expressed in percentage points. Asterisks indicate P values of comparison of Δ to 0 value: *P < 0.05, which is the level of significance set for the study; * *P < 0.017, which is the level of significance when adjusting for multiple testing across 3 study groups using the Bonferroni method. IDDS, Individual Dietary Diversity Score; MPA, mean probability of adequacy; PA, probability of adequacy; SELEVER, Soutenir l'Exploitation Familiale pour Lancer l’Élevage des Volailles et Valoriser l’Économie Rurale; VVV, village volunteer vaccinator and popularizer; WASH, water, hygiene, and sanitation.

2

Number of food groups consumed the previous day of 10 food groups: starchy staples; pulses; nuts and seeds; dairy; meat, poultry, and fish; eggs; dark green leafy vegetables; other vitamin A–rich fruit and vegetables; other vegetables; and other fruit.