Table 3.
Average accuracy of five classifiers before and after applying Box-Cox transformation using three optimization strategies for 10 times regenerated random dataset Figure 1D with different random seeds.
| Classifier | Acc before [%] | Acc after [%] | Full (δ) [%] | Spherical (δ) [%] | Diagonal (δ) [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linear | 84.1 | 86.7 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 0.3 |
| KNN | 92.0 | 92.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Bayesian | 89.0 | 90.2 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| SVC | 91.9 | 92.3 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| NN | 92.3 | 92.6 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Column Acc after corresponded to full optimization, which was observed as the optimal optimization. Spherical was able to get smaller but also consistent improvements. Diagonal achieved smaller gains.