TABLE 1.
Estimates from linear mixed models, results from planned contrast analyses, and effect sizes in response to intragastric administration of solutions containing 25 g D-allulose, 25 g D-allulose + 450 ppm lactisole, 50 g erythritol, 50 g erythritol + 450 ppm lactisole, tap water, and tap water + 450 ppm lactisole to 18 healthy adults1
Test solutions | P values | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Characteristic | D-allulose vs. tap water | D-allulose vs. D-allulose + lactisole | Erythritol vs. tap water | Erythritol vs. erythritol + lactisole | Main effect of test solution | Test solution-by-time interaction |
CCK, pmol/L | 0.77 ± 0.12 | –0.29 ± 0.16 | 1.58 ± 0.19 | 0.03 ± 0.23 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
P Holm | <0.0001 | 0.1703 | <0.0001 | 0.8800 | ||
dz | 1.48 | 1.94 | ||||
GLP-1, pmol/L | 4.08 ± 0.76 | 0.55 ± 1.09 | 7.41 ± 0.96 | 2.40 ± 1.34 | <0.0001 | 0.0203 |
P Holm | <0.0001 | 0.6136 | <0.0001 | 0.1594 | ||
dz | 1.27 | 1.83 | ||||
PYY, pg/mL | 64.4 ± 6.15 | 9.48 ± 6.35 | 104 ± 9.21 | 13.5 ± 8.68 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
P Holm | <0.0001 | 0.2502 | <0.0001 | 0.2502 | ||
dz | 2.47 | 2.67 | ||||
Gastric emptying, dose/h(%13C) | 0.10 ± 0.16 | –0.22 ± 0.28 | –0.37 ± 0.08 | 0.08 ± 0.17 | 0.0003 | <0.0001 |
P Holm | 1 | 1 | 0.0002 | 1 | ||
dz | –1.05 | |||||
Hunger, cm | –0.14 ± 0.24 | 0.56 ± 0.31 | –0.49 ± 0.25 | 0.16 ± 0.28 | 0.2020 | 0.0400 |
P Holm | 0.2283 | 1 | 0.2283 | 1 | ||
Pfc, cm | 0.06 ± 0.21 | 0.39 ± 0.32 | –0.61 ± 0.24 | –0.08 ± 0.27 | 0.0615 | 0.1784 |
P Holm | 0.6811 | 1 | 0.0442 | 1 | ||
dz | –0.62 | |||||
Satiety, cm | –0.23 ± 0.26 | 0.18 ± 0.27 | 0.47 ± 0.29 | 0.41 ± 0.36 | 0.1206 | 0.1521 |
P Holm | 0.7695 | 0.7695 | 0.4533 | 0.7695 | ||
Fullness, cm | –0.18 ± 0.22 | 0.16 ± 0.33 | 0.71 ± 0.24 | 0.62 ± 0.33 | 0.0011 | 0.3473 |
P Holm | 0.8714 | 0.8714 | 0.0190 | 0.2071 | ||
dz | 0.69 |
N = 18 (5 men, 13 women). Estimates are expressed as mean ± SE and represent the changes from baseline for D-allulose and erythritol compared with tap water and the changes from baseline for lactisole within D-allulose and erythritol. Statistical tests: linear mixed-effects modeling followed by planned contrasts with Holm correction for multiple testing and Cohen's dz for paired t tests is reported as a measure of effect size. CCK, cholecystokinin; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide 1; Pfc, prospective food consumption; ppm, parts per million; PYY, peptide tyrosine tyrosine.