Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 2;115(5):1378–1392. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqac016

TABLE 3.

Comparison of DXA-measured and anthropometrically derived body composition in ALS subjects from Cohort #1 (test cohort)1

Equation Mean ± SD Difference from DXA Ratio test equation/DXA P value2 Pearson's correlation (P value)
Body fat, %
 DXA 29.0 ± 10.5
 Jackson and Pollock 22.9 ± 9.1 6.1 ± 5.2 0.79 <0.001 0.87 (<0.001)
 Durnin and Womersley 27.2 ± 8.1 1.8 ± 4.7 0.94 0.09 0.90 (<0.001)
 Deurenberg et al. (BMI) 29.6 ± 7.0 −0.9 ± 6.3 1.02 0.43 0.75 (<0.001)
FM, kg
 DXA 19.6 ± 6.8
 Jackson and Pollock 15.6 ± 6.0 3.8 ± 3.9 0.80 <0.001 0.86 (<0.001)
 Durnin and Womersley 18.7 ± 6.1 0.7 ± 3.0 0.95 0.29 0.92 (<0.001)
 Deurenberg et al. (BMI) 20.8 ± 5.6 −1.2 ± 4.0 1.06 0.12 0.81 (<0.001)
FFM or LBM, kg
 DXA3 46.3 ± 10.0
 Jackson and Pollock4 53.1 ± 10.2 −8.3 ± 4.6 1.15 <0.001 0.94 (<0.001)
 Durnin and Womersley4 50.0 ± 10.2 −5.2 ± 3.2 1.08 <0.001 0.95 (<0.001)
 Deurenberg et al. (BMI)4 49.8 ± 10.2 −3.5 ± 4.5 1.07 <0.001 0.90 (<0.001)
1

n = 29. Values are means ± SDs, unless indicated otherwise. BMI in kg/m2. ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; FFM, fat-free mass; FM, fat mass; LBM, lean body mass.

2

P values are from paired t tests, compared to DXA.

3

FFM from DXA.

4

LBM from equations. The sum of FM and FFM from DXA is lower than the sum of FM and LBM from equations, because DXA calculates bone mass separately, whereas LBM includes bone mass.