TABLE 5.
Indirect and direct effect for the association of E-DII with liver fat through hs-CRP, LBP, and gut microbiome, in MEC-APS participants (n = 1655)1
Indirect effect2 | Direct effect | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mediator | β | SE | 95% CI | β | SE | 95% CI |
High sensitivity C-reactive protein, mg/L | 0.002 | 0.003 | −0.002, 0.011 | 0.399 | 0.066 | 0.269, 0.528 |
Lipopolysaccharide binding protein, μg/mL | 0.008 | 0.006 | −0.001, 0.023 | 0.393 | 0.066 | 0.264, 0.522 |
α Diversity (Shannon) | 0.037 | 0.012 | 0.015, 0.0633 | 0.364 | 0.066 | 0.236, 0.493 |
Phyla4 | ||||||
Actinobacteria | 0.000 | 0.007 | −0.014, 0.015 | 0.401 | 0.066 | 0.271, 0.531 |
Bacteroidetes | 0.006 | 0.009 | −0.011, 0.023 | 0.395 | 0.065 | 0.267, 0.524 |
Cyanobacteria | 0.003 | 0.004 | −0.004, 0.012 | 0.399 | 0.066 | 0.269, 0.528 |
Firmicutes | −0.014 | 0.007 | −0.030, −0.003 | 0.415 | 0.066 | 0.286, 0.544 |
Fusobacteria | 0.038 | 0.013 | 0.016, 0.0663 | 0.363 | 0.065 | 0.235, 0.491 |
Lentisphaerae | 0.008 | 0.005 | −0.002, 0.020 | 0.393 | 0.066 | 0.264, 0.523 |
Proteobacteria | 0.017 | 0.009 | 0.001, 0.037 | 0.384 | 0.066 | 0.256, 0.513 |
Synergistetes | −0.002 | 0.006 | −0.015, 0.008 | 0.403 | 0.066 | 0.274, 0.532 |
Tenericutes | 0.024 | 0.009 | 0.006, 0.043 | 0.378 | 0.066 | 0.249, 0.506 |
Verrucomicrobia | 0.009 | 0.007 | −0.002, 0.024 | 0.392 | 0.066 | 0.263, 0.521 |
Genera4 | ||||||
Anaerostipes | 0.004 | 0.010 | −0.015, 0.025 | 0.398 | 0.067 | 0.267, 0.528 |
Bacteroides | 0.035 | 0.012 | 0.012, 0.060 | 0.366 | 0.065 | 0.238, 0.494 |
Christensenellaceae R-7 group | 0.050 | 0.012 | 0.026, 0.0733 | 0.353 | 0.066 | 0.224, 0.482 |
Collinsella | −0.003 | 0.008 | −0.022, 0.013 | 0.405 | 0.066 | 0.274, 0.535 |
Coprococcus 2 | 0.041 | 0.012 | 0.020, 0.0653 | 0.360 | 0.066 | 0.231, 0.490 |
Erysipelotrichaceae UCG-003 | 0.004 | 0.005 | −0.005, 0.016 | 0.397 | 0.066 | 0.267, 0.527 |
Escherichia-Shigella | 0.036 | 0.012 | 0.016, 0.0623 | 0.365 | 0.066 | 0.236, 0.494 |
[Eubacterium] coprostanoligenes group | −0.003 | 0.008 | −0.020, 0.013 | 0.404 | 0.066 | 0.276, 0.533 |
[Eubacterium] eligens group | 0.003 | 0.013 | −0.003, 0.051 | 0.378 | 0.067 | 0.246, 0.510 |
[Eubacterium] xylanophilum group | 0.052 | 0.013 | 0.029, 0.0793 | 0.349 | 0.066 | 0.219, 0.479 |
Faecalibacterium | 0.006 | 0.008 | −0.009, 0.022 | 0.395 | 0.066 | 0.265, 0.525 |
Flavonifractor | 0.043 | 0.013 | 0.021, 0.0703 | 0.358 | 0.066 | 0.230, 0.487 |
Lachnoclostridium | 0.053 | 0.015 | 0.025, 0.0853 | 0.348 | 0.065 | 0.220, 0.475 |
Lachnospira | 0.009 | 0.009 | −0.007, 0.027 | 0.392 | 0.067 | 0.262, 0.523 |
Lachnospiraceae NC2004 group | 0.024 | 0.011 | 0.004, 0.048 | 0.378 | 0.065 | 0.249, 0.506 |
Lachnospiraceae ND3007 group | 0.016 | 0.009 | 0.002, 0.035 | 0.385 | 0.066 | 0.255, 0.515 |
Lachnospiraceae UCG-001 | 0.002 | 0.004 | −0.006, 0.012 | 0.399 | 0.066 | 0.269, 0.528 |
Lachnospiraceae; other | −0.017 | 0.008 | −0.034, −0.004 | 0.418 | 0.066 | 0.288, 0.548 |
Odoribacter | 0.017 | 0.009 | 0.002, 0.036 | 0.385 | 0.066 | 0.255, 0.514 |
Oscillibacter | 0.008 | 0.006 | −0.002, 0.023 | 0.393 | 0.066 | 0.264, 0.523 |
Parabacteroides | 0.011 | 0.008 | −0.002, 0.029 | 0.390 | 0.066 | 0.260, 0.520 |
Ruminiclostridium 5 | 0.024 | 0.012 | 0.002, 0.0503 | 0.377 | 0.066 | 0.247, 0.508 |
Ruminococcaceae UCG-013 | 0.021 | 0.009 | 0.005, 0.040 | 0.381 | 0.066 | 0.251, 0.510 |
Ruminococcaceae UCG-014 | 0.044 | 0.011 | 0.025, 0.068 | 0.357 | 0.066 | 0.228, 0.846 |
Ruminococcaceae uncultured | −0.005 | 0.007 | −0.019, 0.009 | 0.406 | 0.066 | 0.277, 0.534 |
Ruminococcus 1 | 0.018 | 0.013 | −0.006, 0.045 | 0.383 | 0.067 | 0.252, 0.514 |
[Ruminococcus] gnavus group | 0.085 | 0.018 | 0.052, 0.1223 | 0.317 | 0.066 | 0.187, 0.446 |
Tyzzerella | 0.035 | 0.011 | 0.015, 0.0613 | 0.366 | 0.066 | 0.236, 0.496 |
Mediation analyses conducted through linear regression using the PROCESS macro for SPSS adjusting for age, education, physical activity, race/ethnicity, sex, smoking status, antibiotic use, and total fat mass. E-DII, Energy-Density Dietary Inflammatory Index; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; LBP, lipopolysaccharide binding protein; MEC-APS, Multiethnic Cohort–Adiposity Phenotype Study; NC.
A bootstrap method using iterations of computed samples (5000) was used to determine the significance of the indirect effects.
Significant after Bonferroni adjustment (P < 0.0013).
Centered log ratio transformation for skewed distributions.