Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 30;77(5):850–859. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab159

Table 2.

Proportional Hazards Models Predicting Risk in Dementia

Model 1 (uncontrolled) Model 2 (controlled) Model 3 (mediated)
HR [95% CI], p HR [95% CI], p HR [95% CI], p
cSES 0.689 [0.631–0.747], <.001 0.863 [0.762–0.965], .014 0.867 [0.867–0.959], .018
Age (years) 1.101 [1.088–1.113], <.001 1.099 [1.063–1.073], <.001
Gender 1.064 [0.8551.273], .54 1.063 [0.7630.896], .55
Race: African American/Black 2.708 [2.030–3.386], <.001 2.710 [1.951–2.484], <.001
Race: Otherwise identified 1.651 [0.7852.516], .06 1.542 [1.192–1.822], <.001
Ethnicity 1.126 [0.7261.810], .19 1.223 [0.9211.312], .36
Education (years) 0.910 [0.876–0.944], <.001 0.910 [0.881–0.912], <.001
Year (baseline) 0.799 [0.634–0.964], .033 0.807 [0.887–1.043], .041
Conscientiousness 0.816 [0.895–0.975], <.001
Neuroticism 1.134 [1.052–1.144], .017
Openness 1.134 [0.946–1.048], .025
AIC 6,464.925 4,721.823 4,663.123
BIC 6,472.135 4,778.007 4,747.347

Note: cSES = childhood socioeconomic status; HR = hazard ratio; AIC = Akaike information criterion; BIC = Bayesian information criterion. Values were bolded to denote significance and make it easier for readers to identify this.