Table 2.
Comparison table of dataset 1.
| Performance metrics | Methodology proposed |
|---|---|
| Precision | 0.91 |
| Recall | 0.57 |
| F-measure | 0.70 |
| Accuracy | 0.64 |
| Sensitivity | 0.59 |
| Specificity | 0.72 |
| FDR | 0.09 |
| FNR | 0.38 |
| FAR | 2.8 |
| FRR | 19 |
| MCC | 0.25 |
Comparison table of dataset 1.
| Performance metrics | Methodology proposed |
|---|---|
| Precision | 0.91 |
| Recall | 0.57 |
| F-measure | 0.70 |
| Accuracy | 0.64 |
| Sensitivity | 0.59 |
| Specificity | 0.72 |
| FDR | 0.09 |
| FNR | 0.38 |
| FAR | 2.8 |
| FRR | 19 |
| MCC | 0.25 |