Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 19;29(4):2886–2891. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.01.026

Table 3.

Effect of combinationbetween planting pattern andlithovit rate treatments on land equivalent ratio (LER), area time equivalent ratio (ATER), land utilization efficiency percentage (LUE %), relative crowding coefficient (RCC) and competitive ratio (Cr) during 2018 season.

Planting pattern (roselle: cluster bean) Lithovit
(g /l)
Land equivalent ratio (LER) Area time equivalent ratio (ATER) Land utilization efficiency percentage (LUE %) Relative crowding coefficient (RCC) Competitive ratio
(Crr)
Competitive
ratio
(Crc)
1 row: 2 row 0.0 1.14 1.07 111.13 0.31 1.31 0.76
2.00 1.29 1.20 124.94 0.12 1.10 0.90
4.00 1.27 1.18 122.83 0.26 1.12 0.81
6.00 1.20 1.12 116.58 0.41 1.38 0.72
1 row: 3 rows 0.0 1.31 1.22 127.20 0.78 1.70 0.58
2.00 1.24 1.15 120.14 0.84 1.81 0.55
4.00 1.23 1.14 119.02 0.87 1.86 0.53
6.00 1.20 1.11 115.90 0.80 1.80 0.55
2 row: 3 rows 0.0 1.10 1.03 106.98 0.20 1.20 0.83
2.00 1.13 1.06 109.62 0.20 1.19 0.84
4.00 1.11 1.05 108.60 0.26 1.26 0.79
6.00 1.07 1.01 104.34 0.25 1.26 0.79
LSD at 5 % 0.05 0.05 5.60 0.08 0.10 0.06