Table 1.
Time (h) | NC | WJ | WJ + CAP | CC | CC + CAP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0.029 (0.024–0.034) | 0* (0–0.001) | 0* (0–0) | 0* (0–0) | 0* (0–0) |
8 | 0.249 (0.067–0.442) | 0.001* (0–0.003) | 0* (0–0.001) | 0.021*,Δ (0.003–0.097) | 0* (0–0) |
16 | 0.595 (0.552–0.609) | 0.002* (0–0.308) | 0* (0–0.001) | 0.326 †,Δ (0.043–0.335) | 0* (0–0.312) |
20 | 0.615 (0.571–0.641) | 0.038* (0.004–0.315) | 0.003* (0.000–0.007) | 0.341 †,Δ (0.273–0.359) | 0.006* (0–0.328) |
24 | 0.622 (0.545–0.640) | 0.130* (0.009–0.295) | 0.001*,Δ (0–0.034) | 0.357 Δ (0.316–0.530) | 0.001*‡ (0–0.909) |
48 | 0.847 (0.708–0.920) | 0.644 ‡ (0.573–0.663) | 0*,Δ (0–0.306) | 0.692 Δ (0.552–0.747) | 0.208*‡ (0–0.249) |
96 | 1.242 (1.163–1.305) | 1.189 ‡ (1.098–1.384) | 0*,Δ (0–0.383) | 1.210 Δ (1.121–1.378) | 0.252*,‡ (0–0.335) |
NC negative control, WJ water jet, WJ + CAP water jet and cold atmospheric plasma, CC curette + cotton swab, CC curette + cotton swab and cold atmospheric plasma
Comparisons were done using Mann–Whitney U tests. Benjamini–Hochberg corrected p-values (WJ vs. CC + CAP and CC vs. WJ + CAP were not compared); *significantly different compared to NC; †significantly different compared to WJ; ‡significantly different compared to WJ + CAP; Δsignificantly different compared to CC + CAP