Summary of findings 2. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of resectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
Review question: what is the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of resectable HCC in people with chronic liver disease? | |||||||||
Population: adults with chronic liver disease | |||||||||
Setting: clinical setting (secondary or tertiary care setting) or surveillance programmes | |||||||||
Study design: cross‐sectional studies | |||||||||
Index test: MRI | |||||||||
Target condition: resectable HCC | |||||||||
Reference standards
| |||||||||
Limitations in the evidence: risk of bias and applicability concerns (total 16 studies which had all participants with resectable HCC)
| |||||||||
Findings | |||||||||
Index test | Number of studies (participants) | Sensitivity (95% CI) | Specificity (95% CI) | Implications in a hypothetical cohort of 1000 people | |||||
Prevalencea% | True positives will receive appropriate treatment (surgical resection) | False negatives will be misdiagnosed and not undergo surgical resection | True negatives will not undergo inappropriate further testing or surgical resection | False positives will undergo inappropriate further testing or surgical resection | Certainty of the evidence | ||||
MRI | 16 (2150) |
84.3% (77.6% to 89.3%) | 92.9% (88.3% to 95.9%) | 36 | 303 | 57 | 595 | 45 | Lowb |
56 | 472 | 88 | 409 | 31 | |||||
66 | 556 | 104 | 316 | 24 | |||||
CI: confidence interval; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging. |
aWe chose for exemplification three values of hepatocellular carcinoma prevalence: 36% for a population with low clinical suspicion, 56% as a median derived from our study analysis, and 66% for population with high clinical suspicion (assessment of nodules detected by ultrasound). bDowngraded two levels for risk of bias and indirectness.