Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 1;9(61):35588–35598. doi: 10.1039/c9ra03981c

Comparison of fluoride adsorption properties of HAP-MMT nanocomposite with other reported HAP based materials.

Adsorbent (mm) Concentration range or highest concentration used (ppm) Contact Time (min) Adsorption capacity (mg g−1) Filter bed column studies Ref.
Initial concentration Flow rate Diameter, thickness of column Break through capacity
Modified HAP with activated alumina 10–200 480 14.4 3 Not given 11 400 L g−1 63
Al-HAP 200 180 98.8 5 10 ml min−1 2, 0.3 1568 L m−2 64
HAP-MMT 30 30 16.7 1.5 10 ml min−1 10, 0.2 1600 L g−1 This work
HAP-alginate 10 30 3.87 Not reported 57
HAP-cellulose 10 360 4.2 Not reported 35
Magnetic HAP-alginate 10 30 4.05 Not reported 15
HAP-CTS 10 30 1.56 Not reported 65
Multiwall CNT-HAP 3–50 150 30.22 Not reported 30
HAP-gelatin 8–14 4.157 Not reported 58
CNT-HAP 300 11.05 Not reported 58
Mineral substituted HAP 10 60 8.36 Not reported 66