TABLE 2.
log BF compared to controls | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Controls | ICI | Acute | Progressive | ICI | Acute | Progressive | log BF progressive versus acute | |
Animals raw score | 16.62 (5.33) | 15.13 (5.15)* | 15.29 (5.23)* | 14.31 (4.62)* | 4.34 | 2.79 | 2.69 | −0.27 |
Animals speed score | 8.54 (3.56) | 7.26 (3.29)* | 7.41 (3.37)* | 6.49 (2.72)* a | 9.19 | 6.34 | 6.54 | 0.50 |
Letter F raw score | 11.63 (4.51) | 10.78 (4.69)* | 10.70 (4.63)* | 11.17 (4.97) | 1.15 | 1.40 | −0.74 | −0.74 |
Letter F speed score | 4.89 (2.57) | 4.25 (2.55)* | 4.25 (2.59)* | 4.26 (2.51)* | 3.08 | 2.73 | 0.18 | −0.92 |
Abbreviations: BF, Bayes factor (presented as the base‐10 logarithm due to extreme variation); ICI, incident cognitive impairment.
P < .05; a indicates P < .05 compared to acute decliners.
Note: log BF > 0 suggests at least weak evidence for effect, > 1 suggests strong evidence for effect, < 0 suggests at least weak evidence against the presence of an effect, < –1 suggests strong evidence against the presence of an effect.