Skip to main content
. 2022 May 6;14(1):e12277. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12277

TABLE 2.

Comparison of verbal fluency scores among groups

log BF compared to controls
Controls ICI Acute Progressive ICI Acute Progressive log BF progressive versus acute
Animals raw score 16.62 (5.33) 15.13 (5.15)* 15.29 (5.23)* 14.31 (4.62)* 4.34 2.79 2.69 −0.27
Animals speed score 8.54 (3.56) 7.26 (3.29)* 7.41 (3.37)* 6.49 (2.72)* a 9.19 6.34 6.54 0.50
Letter F raw score 11.63 (4.51) 10.78 (4.69)* 10.70 (4.63)* 11.17 (4.97) 1.15 1.40 −0.74 −0.74
Letter F speed score 4.89 (2.57) 4.25 (2.55)* 4.25 (2.59)* 4.26 (2.51)* 3.08 2.73 0.18 −0.92

Abbreviations: BF, Bayes factor (presented as the base‐10 logarithm due to extreme variation); ICI, incident cognitive impairment.

*

P < .05; a indicates P < .05 compared to acute decliners.

Note: log BF > 0 suggests at least weak evidence for effect, > 1 suggests strong evidence for effect, < 0 suggests at least weak evidence against the presence of an effect, < –1 suggests strong evidence against the presence of an effect.