Metabolites discriminating DN and type 2 diabetes subjects by UPLC-MS analysisa.
Metabolites | Trendb | Related pathway | DN vs. control | DN + BLC vs. DN | P valuec | FC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P valuec | FC | |||||
5-Methoxytryptophan | ↓ | Tryptophan metabolism | 5.79 × 10−3 | 0.46 | 4.82 × 10−3 | 2.70 |
p-Hydroxyphenylacetic acid | ↑ | Phenylalanine metabolism | 8.01 × 10−4 | 3.89 | 8.24 × 10−2 | 0.65 |
5-Hydroxy-6-methoxyindole glucuronide | ↑ | Tryptophan metabolism | 8.09 × 10−3 | 2.22 | 3.87 × 10−3 | 0.33 |
2-Phenylglycine | ↑ | Glycine metabolism | 5.36 × 10−3 | 2.69 | 4.79 × 10−2 | 0.49 |
Indoleacetyl glutamine | ↑ | Tryptophan metabolism | 4.06 × 10−5 | 3.60 | 5.53 × 10−2 | 0.75 |
Indoxyl glucuronide | ↑ | Tryptophan metabolism | 2.75 × 10−2 | 2.72 | 5.47 × 10−3 | 0.50 |
l-Histidine | ↓ | Histidine metabolism | 6.80 × 10−3 | 0.38 | 6.10 × 10−3 | 3.04 |
Uric acid | ↑ | Purine metabolism | 3.32 × 10−4 | 2.87 | 2.75 × 10−2 | 0.39 |
2-Phenylacetamide | ↑ | Phenylalanine metabolism | 3.82 × 10−2 | 2.01 | 9.16 × 10−2 | 0.82 |
Phenyl glucuronide | ↑ | 8.31 × 10−3 | 2.50 | 1.00 × 10−2 | 0.47 | |
Purine | ↑ | Purine metabolism | 3.90 × 10−2 | 1.86 | 8.88 × 10−2 | 0.59 |
L-Tryptophan | ↓ | Tryptophan metabolism | 3.68 × 10−2 | 0.47 | 1.77 × 10−2 | 1.73 |
Hippuric acid | ↑ | Glycine metabolism | 7.22 × 10−5 | 2.91 | 6.79 × 10−3 | 0.64 |
Phenylacetylglutamine | ↑ | Glutamine metabolism | 3.79 × 10−2 | 2.01 | 9.53 × 10−2 | 0.70 |
4-Hydroxyhippuric acid | ↑ | Glycine metabolism | 5.81 × 10−3 | 2.52 | 4.38 × 10−2 | 0.53 |
Indoxylsulfuric acid | ↑ | Tryptophan metabolism | 4.29 × 10−2 | 2.14 | 2.26 × 10−2 | 0.62 |
p-Cresol sulfate | ↑ | Tyrosine metabolism | 1.93 × 10−2 | 1.56 | 3.10 × 10−2 | 0.55 |
p-Cresol glucuronide | ↑ | Tyrosine metabolism | 3.92 × 10−3 | 3.44 | 1.45 × 10−2 | 0.48 |
Citric acid | ↓ | TCA cycle | 9.53 × 10−3 | 0.47 | 1.47 × 10−2 | 2.25 |
Abbreviations: DN, diabetic nephropathy; BLC, Bailing capsule; FC, fold change.
Arrow (↑) indicates relative increase in signal. Arrow (↓) indicates relative decrease in signal.
The P value was calculated by one-way ANOVA and then by the Tukey post hoc test for comparisons of multiple groups.