Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Saf Sci. 2021 Jul 20;142:105353. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105353

Table 3.

Safety climate measures by current versus past general contractor project, stratified by general contractor size

Outcomes Surveys
n
Current Project
mean (CI)*
Past Project
mean (CI)*
P*
Large General Contractor n 3 5
General Contractor Safety 586 77.8 (74.2–81.4) 64.9 (59.1–70.7) <0.0001
Subcontractor Safety 583 83.0 (80.4–85.6) 79.3 (74.6–84.0) 0.04
Coworker Safety 580 82.8 (80.3–85.4) 76.6 (71.9–81.2) 0.0005
Self Safety 575 82.7 (80.5–84.9) 79.4 (75.4–83.4) 0.03
Crew Safety 575 84.8 (82.4–87.1) 82.0 (78.0–86.1) 0.07

Small General Contractor n 3 22
General Contractor Safety 524 69.8 (65.6–74.0) 70.5 (66.7–74.3) 0.68
Subcontractor Safety 520 80.4 (77.2–83.5) 79.3 (76.3–82.2) 0.43
Coworker Safety 517 78.3 (75.3–81.4) 79.6 (76.7–82.5) 0.37
Self Safety 519 81.6 (78.9–84.4) 81.8 (79.3–84.3) 0.92
Crew Safety 519 82.0 (79.2–84.9) 81.1 (78.5–83.7) 0.42
*

Means, confidence intervals and P values derived from hierarchical linear models, where safety score is the outcome variable, project (current versus past), general contractor size and interaction of project by general contractor size are the independent variables (fixed effects).

Interaction P values for general contractor safety (P<0.0001) and coworker safety (P=0.001) indicate the relationship between project and these safety scores vary by general contractor size. Interaction P values for other safety scores (0.09 to 0.38) were not significant.

155 surveys in past project not included, due to general contractor size not obtained

Random intercepts for subcontractor and participant nested within subcontractor included to account for within group clustering