Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Saf Sci. 2021 Jul 20;142:105353. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105353

Table 4.

General contractor required safety policies and subcontractors lacking required safety policies

Category Safety policy # GC with policy, N SCs on projects with policies, N SCs lacking Policies, N Proportion of subcontractors by size lacking the policy
Total (%) Small* (%) Medium* (%) Large* (%)
Safety Specific Policy 100% 6’ tie off policy, all trades 6 91 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
100% Tie off scissor lift policy 5 79 74 93.7 92.3 100.0 83.3
Daily Mandatory Stretch and Flex 2 36 34 94.4 90.9 100.0 88.9
Use ladders as the last option 1 17 17 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
All materials stored off ground 1 17 17 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Documentation Written safety program 6 91 4 4.4 9.1 0.0 5.0
Weekly contractor Toolbox Talk 6 91 16 17.6 24.2 15.8 10.0
Equipment inspection checklist 5 79 21 26.6 53.8 11.4 16.7
Daily Pre-Task Plan Document 4 63 24 38.1 72.2 36.7 0.0

PPE Policy 100% Hard Hat 6 91 3 3.3 6.1 0.0 5.0
100% Glasses 6 91 1 1.1 3.0 0.0 0.0
100% Boots 6 91 3 3.3 6.1 0.0 5.0
100% High Viz 5 79 2 2.5 3.8 0.0 5.6
100% Gloves 2 36 24 66.7 90.9 62.5 44.4
Double eye protection$ 1 14 11 78.6 66.7 85.7 75.0

GC=general contractor; SC= subcontractor; PPE= personal protective equipment;

#

Safety policies are defined as rules and procedures required by the general contractor.

*

Subcontractor by size: small (n= 33), medium (n= 38), large (n= 20); note the number of subcontractors by size for each policy was dependent on the number of subcontractors employed on general contractor projects that required the policy.

$

Double eye protection was only required for selected tasks/tool use that risked causing particles in the eyes (welding, cutting, grinding) so eliminated painters and electricians (3 subcontractors)