Table 3.
Study name, y | Selection | Comparability | Outcome | Overall score |
---|---|---|---|---|
Broeg‐Morvay et al, 2016 30 | 3* | 2* | 3* | 8/9 |
Casetta et al, 2019 31 | 3* | 2* | 3* | 8/9 |
Du et al, 2021 32 | 3* | 2* | 2* | 7/9 |
Gong et al, 2019 33 | 3* | 2* | 2* | 7/9 |
Kass‐Hout et al, 2014 29 | 3* | 0* | 2* | 5/9 |
Pienimäki et al, 2021 34 | 3* | 2* | 2* | 7/9 |
Tong et al, 2021 22 | 3* | 2* | 3* | 8/9 |
Wang et al, 2017 35 | 4* | 2* | 3* | 9/9 |
Weber et al, 2017 36 | 3* | 2* | 3* | 8/9 |