Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 2;10(23):e023222. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023222

Table 4.

Sensitivity, PPV, Accuracy and Score for Each Rhythm Following 5‐Times 5‐fold Cross‐Validation (Highlighted in Grey), as Well as the Positive Predictive Value Observed by Bedside Monitors

Rhythm Sensitivity (%) PPV (%) Accuracy (%) Score (%) PPV (%) Current study (clinical annotations) PPV (%) Physionet 2015 Challenge PPV (%) MIMIC II study PPV (%) UCSF study
Aystole 100.00±0.00 61.58±0.00 99.42±0.00 99.42±0.00 11.31 16.67 9.33 32.83
EB 99.29±0.78 82.64±3.04 98.65±0.27 98.65±0.26 22.64 50 70.71 NA
ET 91.55±0.85 96.11±0.96 99.20±0.02 98.64±0.11 17.11 94.92 76.93 NA
VF 79.45±9.84 78.83±12.51 99.29±0.33 99.29±0.33 21.74 10.34 20.33 67.72
VT 97.33±0.60 95.13±0.99 98.73±0.21 98.22±0.27 53.66 26.23 53.42 13.00
AF 89.99±1.13 74.41±1.44 90.48±0.42 84.61±0.89 NA NA NA NA
SR 80.33±1.41 94.74±0.81 89.16±0.45 NA NA NA NA NA

AF indicates atrial fibrillation; EB, extreme bradycardia; ET, extreme tachycardia; MIMIC, Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care; NA, not applicable; PPV, positive predictive value; SR, sinus rhythm; USCF, University of California, San Francisco; VF, ventricular fibrillation; and VT, ventricular tachycardia.