Table 3.
Results of Conditional Multilevel Models Predicting Child Externalizing and Internalizing Trajectories
| Predictors of Age 7-14 Child Externalizing Behavior Trajectory | Predictors of Age 7-14 Child Internalizing Behavior Trajectory | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mother Parenting
Model B (SE) |
Father Parenting
Model B (SE) |
Mother Parenting Model
B (SE) |
Father Parenting
Model B (SE) |
|
| Intercept | 13.13 (1.53) ** | 14.46 (1.55) ** | 13.70 (1.64) ** | 18.61 (1.63) ** |
| Age (i.e., Slope Term) | −0.55 (.13) ** | −0.66 (.14) ** | −0.89 (.16) ** | −1.46 (.20) ** |
| Age2 (i.e., Quadratic Term) | 0.08 (.02) ** | 0.08 (.02) ** | 0.11 (.02) ** | 0.13 (.02) ** |
| Between Culture Effects | ||||
| Coldness/Lack of Affection | 0.15 (.30) | 0.08 (.35) | 0.00 (.42) | −0.31 (0.46) |
| Hostility/Aggression | 20.50 (12.92) | 22.28 (23.25) | 21.01 (19.19) | 56.97 (31.14) |
| Indifference/Neglect | 4.22 (7.70) | 5.49 (8.05) | 7.04 (11.78) | 2.99 (10.33) |
| Indifference/Neglect x Age | N/A | N/A | −2.70 (1.34) * | −2.08 (1.25) |
| Indifference/Neglect x Age2 | N/A | N/A | 0.60 (.16) ** | 0.52 (.16) ** |
| Undifferentiated Rejection | −5.72 (10.10) | −4.80 (13.20) | −12.88 (15.01) | −22.02 (17.72) |
| Parent Education | −17.04 (9.53) | −16.85 (14.03) | −16.48 (14.09) | −36.96 (18.81) |
| Parent Education x Age | −1.21 (.66) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Parent Education x Age2 | 0.22 (.10) * | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Within Culture Effects | ||||
| Coldness/Lack of Affection | 0.27 (.12) * | 0.35 (.11) ** | 0.09 (.45) | 0.37 (.12) ** |
| Hostility/Aggression | 0.86 (.17) ** | 0.59 (.18) ** | 1.26 (.16) ** | 0.55 (.19) ** |
| Indifference/Neglect | 0.23 (.14) | 0.36 (.14) ** | 0.87 (0.25) ** | 0.93 (.14) ** |
| Indifference/Neglect *Age | N/A | N/A | 0.17 (.07) * | N/A |
| Undifferentiated Rejection | 2.38 (.45) ** | 0.38 (.18) * | 1.19 (0.30) ** | 1.04 (.18) ** |
| Undifferentiated Rejection x Age | −1.27 (.31) ** | N/A | −0.29 (.09) ** | N/A |
| Undifferentiated Rejection x Age2 | 0.18 (.05) ** | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Parent Education | −0.08 (.03) ** | −0.09 (.03) ** | −0.11 (.03) ** | −0.21 (.04) ** |
| Parent Education x Age | N/A | N/A | N/A | 0.03 (.01) ** |
| Child Gender | 0.79 (.22) ** | 0.90 (.23) ** | −0.77 (.21) ** | −0.72 (.22) ** |
Note:
p ≤ .01
p ≤ .05. Significant parameters are also bolded for easier identification. Intercept indicates parents’ score on parenting measure at age 7. Some parenting X age and parenting X age2 slope terms are reported as “N/A” in some models but not others. This is because if a slope term was significant, it was kept in the model and reported. However, if a slope term was non-significant it was trimmed from the model in the interest of parsimony and to ensure other effects were interpreted correctly. Importantly, some parenting X age and parenting X age2 slope terms were not significant in any model, and therefore trimmed from all models and not reported at all in the table. For instance, both the coldness/lack of affection and hostility/aggression slope terms were found to be non-significant at both the between-culture and within-culture level in every model examined. Therefore, those Hostility/Aggression X Age and Coldness/Lack of Affection X Age interaction terms are not shown in the table at all because they would take up needless space (i.e., every cell in their rows would read “N/A”). In other words, slope terms are listed as N/A in models where they are non-significant if those same terms are significant in other models. However, they are not listed at all if they were non-significant in all models, to save space.