Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 18;11(7):e024036. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024036

Table 1.

Study and Patient Characteristics

Study Country of origin Study design Years of enrollment Sample size, N Imaging tool used to define EDFF EDFF prevalence, n/total (%) Mean age at initial ToF repair, y Mean interval between ToF repair and assessment, y Mean age at assessment, y
Aburawi 2014 24 Sweden Prospective NR 20 CMR 9/20 (45.0) NR NR 10.2
Ahmad 2012 15 Canada Retrospective 2008–2010 112 Doppler echocardiography 58/112 (51.8) 0.9 NR 12.9
Apitz 2010 25 Germany Prospective NR 25 CMR 8/25 (32.0) NR 7.1 17.9
Babu‐Narayan 2012 26 (overlap with Krupickova 2018) United Kingdom Prospective 2002–2005 64 Doppler echocardiography 27/64 (42.2) 6.0 25.1 30.1
Bonello 2013 27 United Kingdom Prospective 2002–2008 148 Doppler echocardiography 38/148 (25.7) 4.8 NR 32.1
Cardoso 2003 28 Brazil Prospective 2000 30 Doppler echocardiography 19/30 (63.3) 3.0 3.2 8.7
Chaturvedi 1999 29 United Kingdom Prospective NR 11 Doppler echocardiography 4/11 (36.4) NR NR 1.7
Cheng 2019 30 United States Retrospective 1999–2014 38 CMR 15/38 (39.5) NR NR 13.2
Cheung 2003 31 Australia Prospective 1981–1990 45 Doppler echocardiography 24/45 (53.3) 2.1 12.5 15.0
Choi 2008 32 Korea Retrospective 1997–2000 43 Doppler echocardiography 15/43 (34.9) 2.1 5.4 4.8
Clark 1995 33 (overlap with Gatzoulis 1995) United Kingdom Prospective 1958–1979 30 Doppler echocardiography 18/30 (60.0) NR 21.8 27.8
Cullen 1995 5 United Kingdom Prospective 1992–1993 35 Doppler echocardiography 17/35 (48.6) NR NR 1.9
Eroglu 1999 8 Turkey Prospective 1986–1996 44 Doppler echocardiography 25/44 (56.8) 4.0 NR 7.7
Gatzoulis 1995 6 (overlap with Clark 1995) United Kingdom Prospective 1958–1979 38 Doppler echocardiography 20/38 (52.6) 5.2 NR 28.8
Gatzoulis 1998 34 (overlap with Norgard 1996) United Kingdom Retrospective 1985–1994 92 Doppler echocardiography 36/92 (39.1) NR 4.5 14.7
Helbing 1996 11 The Netherlands Prospective NR 19 Doppler echocardiography 13/19 (68.4) 1.5 10.0 12.0
Kordybach‐Prokopiuk 2018 35 Poland Prospective NR 83 Doppler echocardiography 16/83 (19.3) 11.9 21.6 31.5
Krupickova 2018 36 (overlap with Babu‐Narayan 2012) United Kingdom Prospective 2002–2005 64 Doppler echocardiography 26/64 (40.6) 6.1 25.1 31.1
Kutty 2018 37 United States Retrospective 2005–2012 399 Doppler echocardiography 122/399 (30.6) 1.1 18.5 20.5
Latus 2013 38 Germany Retrospective 2007–2011 53 CMR 15/53 (28.3) 1.3 12.1 13.3
Lee 2013 39 Canada Retrospective 2007–2009 50 CMR 33/50 (66.0) 1.3 NR 13.0
Lu 2010 12 United States Prospective 2008–2009 59 CMR 40/59 (67.8) 11.0 NR 35.0
Luijnenburg 2013 40 The Netherlands Prospective 2007–2010 51 CMR 31/51 (60.8) 2.8 NR 21.0
Maskatia 2013 41 United States Retrospective 1997–2011 178 CMR 77/178 (43.3) 3.0 NR NR
Maskatia 2015 42 United States Retrospective NR 99 Doppler echocardiography 43/99 (43.4) NR NR 14.2
Mercer‐Rosa 2018 43 United States Prospective NR 88 Doppler echocardiography 77/88 (87.5) 0.4 NR 12.7
Mori 2017 16 Japan Retrospective 2009–2016 62 Doppler echocardiography 23/62 (37.1) 3.1 NR 15.7
Munkhammar 1998 44 United Kingdom Prospective 1985–1996 47 Doppler echocardiography 13/47 (27.7) 0.7 NR 4.4
Munkhammar 2013 45 Sweden Prospective NR 31 Doppler echocardiography 16/31 (51.6) 1.0 9.2 10.2
Norgard 1996 46 (overlap with Gatzoulis 1998) United Kingdom Retrospective 1985–1994 92 Doppler echocardiography 36/92 (39.1) 11.5 NR 14.7
Norgard 1998 7 (early restriction) United Kingdom Prospective 1992–1995 34 Doppler echocardiography 16/34 (47.1) 5.9 1.8 NR
Norgard 1998 7 (late restriction) United Kingdom Prospective 1992–1995 32 Doppler echocardiography 10/32 (31.3) 5.6 1.8 NR
Peng 2012 47 United Kingdom Prospective NR 18 Doppler echocardiography 4/18 (22.2) 1.6 NR 1.6
Pijuan‐Domenech 2014 48 Spain Prospective 2009–2012 20 Doppler echocardiography 16/20 (80.0) 7.7 NR 35.0
Rathore 2006 49 Australia Prospective 2001–2003 80 Doppler echocardiography 52/80 (65.0) NR NR 7.9
Sachdev 2006 50 India Prospective 2004–2005 50 Doppler echocardiography 24/50 (48.0) NR NR 5.0
Samyn 2013 13 United States Prospective 2008–2009 29 Doppler echocardiography 12/29 (41. 4) 1.4 14.0 16.3
Sandeep 2019 51 China Prospective 2017–2018 50 Doppler echocardiography 28/50 (56.0) NR NR 2.2
Sani 2020 52 Iran Prospective 2015–2016 30 CMR 18/30 (60.0) NR 20.2 26.5
Shekerdemian 1999 53 United Kingdom Prospective NR 23 Doppler echocardiography 8/23 (34.8) NR NR 2.5
Shin 2016 54 Korea Retrospective 2005–2015 116 Doppler echocardiography 35/116 (30.2) 2.3 14.2 NR
Sjöberg 2018 55 Sweden Prospective NR 15 CMR 10/15 (66.7) NR NR 29.0
Tominaga 2021 56 Japan Retrospective 2003–2019 46 Doppler echocardiography 23/46 (50.0) 3.4 31.0 37.0
van den Berg 2007 14 The Netherlands Prospective 2002–2004 36 Doppler echocardiography 24/36 (66. 7) 0.9 15.3 16.0
Vukomanovic 2006 57 Serbia and Montenegro Prospective 1995–2004 60 Doppler echocardiography 18/60 (30.0) 4.3 NR 9.0
Xu 2014 58 China Retrospective 2011–2012 80 Doppler echocardiography 30/80 (37.5) 1.2 NR 1.2

CMR indicates cardiac magnetic resonance; EDFF, end‐diastolic forward flow; NR, not reported; and ToF, tetralogy of Fallot.